30.06.2013 Views

Romanian Military Thinking

Romanian Military Thinking

Romanian Military Thinking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140<br />

<strong>Romanian</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Thinking</strong> ~ 4/2007<br />

According to the reasons that generated the concept, the Battlegroups are expected<br />

to be capable to respond with rapid and decisive action in support of the tasks listed<br />

in Article 17 of the Treaty on European Union, known as the “Petersberg Tasks”<br />

as well as those mentioned in the European Security Strategy 19 . The range of mission<br />

is consistent with the objectives identified by the GAERC at its May 17, 2004 Meeting<br />

and includes: humanitarian and rescue tasks; peacekeeping; task of combat forces<br />

in crisis management, including peacemaking; joint disarmament operations; support<br />

for third countries in combating terrorism; security sector reform as part of broader<br />

institution building.<br />

Therefore, through the creation and use concept, it results that European Battlegroups<br />

can efficiently be used in autonomous operations, with limited scope, on short-term,<br />

missions under a UN mandate included.<br />

Another regional rapid reaction capability at the UN’s disposal is the African<br />

Stand-by Force – ASF. In this respect, Article 5-2 of the Constitutive Act of the African<br />

Union in 2002 establishes the Peace and Security Council, a “collective security and rapid<br />

reaction system aiming at providing rapid and efficient reaction to crisis and conflict<br />

situations in Africa”, through the African Stand-by Force. The general draft adopted by<br />

the African chiefs of state stipulates the progressive establishment of ASF until 2010.<br />

The essential contribution to ASF belongs to sub-regional organisations, the Economic<br />

Community of West African States – ECOWAS, the Southern African Development<br />

Community – SADC, the Intergovernmental Authority on Development – IGAD, the<br />

Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa – EMCCA and to North Africa.<br />

These regions will each house an ASF brigade. Except for ECOWAS and SADC, the<br />

decision regarding ASF intervention mandate belongs to the African Union.<br />

The African Standby Force is conceived for fulfilling the following mission types:<br />

military support for a political mission; joint observer missions together with the UN;<br />

independent observer missions; peacekeeping and preventive deployment missions;<br />

support for complex and multidimensional missions (humanitarian tasks, disarmament<br />

operations, operation as part of broader institutions building missions etc.), carried out<br />

in the presence of certain hostile groups; emergency intervention, for example in case<br />

of genocide acts, when the international community is behind schedule.<br />

The ASF draft stipulates that each sub-regional organisation owns a stand-by brigade<br />

formed by 3 500 – 6 500 troops distributed in the national armies of member states and<br />

equipped with 170 military vehicles and 4 helicopters at least. At the African Union<br />

level, ASF will have 300 – 500 military observers, 240 civil policemen and an undetermined<br />

number of civil experts for the structures of human rights, humanitarian aid,<br />

disarmament, reconstruction and others.<br />

In the first stage, it is stipulated the establishment, until 2005, of a planning structure<br />

at the level of both the African Union and the sub-regional organisations, providing<br />

19 Declaration of European <strong>Military</strong> Capabilities, <strong>Military</strong> Capabilities Commitment Conference,<br />

22 November 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!