30.06.2013 Views

Romanian Military Thinking

Romanian Military Thinking

Romanian Military Thinking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Opinions • Arguments • Certitudes • Perspectives<br />

possible. He makes logistics a real science<br />

of detail or of General Staff and divides it<br />

into 18 branches among which – as well as<br />

the branches that today we consider<br />

as included in the field of logistics – the<br />

organization of reconnaissance and security,<br />

the issue of orders and other things.<br />

In addition, as «old» Official of General<br />

Staff he says that leadership skills are<br />

not sufficient: a Commander needs<br />

to count on capable and loyal soldiers,<br />

on a well-prepared and efficient Command,<br />

on armed and well-trained troops and a good<br />

logistical organization. He also considers<br />

geography extremely important.<br />

In particular, he thinks that the study<br />

of the characteristics of the theatre of war<br />

and the battlefield and the study of the<br />

enemy devices enable us to find the key<br />

point at which forces must be concentrated<br />

and show how they must be moved and<br />

fuelled rapidly and precisely.<br />

Before the Napoleonic Wars, the wars<br />

of Frederick II provided him with a good<br />

model because they were rapid, decisive<br />

and conducted by small volunteer armies<br />

without bothering the civilians: for this<br />

reason he considered the probable<br />

occurrence of bloody Napoleonic Wars<br />

in future, which would originate from<br />

the French Revolution and be based on<br />

compulsory military service, as a misfortune.<br />

He also highlighted<br />

the negative aspects<br />

of the system of the<br />

Napoleonic French<br />

armies and of those<br />

of the Revolution which<br />

had aroused the public<br />

hostility because of<br />

extortion and robbery,<br />

in wide, sparsely<br />

Napoleon inciting the troops<br />

populated or poor geographical areas<br />

(for example, Russia, Sweden and Poland)<br />

leaving them without any provisions;<br />

therefore, it is necessary to be able to exploit<br />

the resources of the countries that have<br />

been invaded sensibly and moderately.<br />

According to Jomini, the activities<br />

of guerrilla warfare and counter-insurgency<br />

cannot be included in the system of<br />

principles which he formulated. However,<br />

referring to the considerable difficulties<br />

that the French Armies encountered in the<br />

Spanish guerrilla warfare during the period<br />

1808-1813, he observed that «in these<br />

kinds of wars it is difficult to subdue people<br />

without separating them from each other;<br />

if soldiers join each other in the fighting,<br />

they will be likely to lose the provinces that<br />

have been conquered. The only solution<br />

is to have an army that leads campaigns<br />

and some independent Divisions that<br />

organize the zones behind the front line.<br />

These Divisions must be commanded by<br />

well-educated Generals who are good<br />

administrators and resolute and fair people<br />

in order that their soldiers can subdue,<br />

with the force of arms, the provinces that<br />

have been assigned to them». In addition,<br />

he emphasizes the positive aspects of an<br />

army (like the English Army in the war of<br />

Spain) that can be provided with supplies<br />

by sea.<br />

Both Jomini and<br />

Clausewitz are real<br />

interpreters of the<br />

Napoleonic model and<br />

both of them consider<br />

the strategies as<br />

dependent on politics:<br />

whereas Clausewitz<br />

sees war as an art,<br />

Jomini regards it as<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!