Copyright by Nysha Chaderton 2009 - The University of Texas at ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 2.38a: Inner Turner’s Hall Ridge measured stratigraphic section, interpreted as deposits of a deep water fan depositional lobe. 109
Figure 2.38b: Inner Turner’s Hall Ridge measured stratigraphic section interpreted as deposits of a deep water fan depositional lobe. 110
Page 1 and 2:
Copyright by Nysha Chaderton 2009
Page 3 and 4:
Sedimentation within the Tobago For
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgements I would like to th
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents List of Tables ..
Page 9 and 10:
List of Tables Table 2.1: Latitudes
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 2.14: Planar parallel lamina
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 2.42: Coarse, cobble and peb
Page 15 and 16:
Figure A.3a: Chalky Mount Ridge mea
Page 17 and 18:
1. Development history of the south
Page 19 and 20:
Formation. This interpretation requ
Page 21 and 22:
DATA AND METHODOLOGY Extensive work
Page 23 and 24:
DESCRIPTIVE METHODOLOGY Each sectio
Page 25 and 26:
Two or more channel complexes stack
Page 27 and 28:
These poorly sorted sands are later
Page 29 and 30:
East Coast Road Although the East C
Page 31 and 32:
succession of interlaminated siltst
Page 33 and 34:
Mount All The beds of the Mount All
Page 35 and 36:
Lobes are non-channelized bodies, 3
Page 37 and 38:
Sandy units are the most resistant
Page 39 and 40:
SUMMARY DEPOSITIONAL SETTING OF THE
Page 41 and 42:
Chapter Three: Petrographic Analysi
Page 43 and 44:
had not been buried deeply or long
Page 45 and 46:
Feldspars Calcium Plagioclase Felds
Page 47 and 48:
Authigenic Minerals Authigenic mine
Page 49 and 50:
amounts of chlorite and kaolinite c
Page 51 and 52:
Sample: WRA 16 This sample was take
Page 53 and 54:
cementation is observed. A number o
Page 55 and 56:
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS WORK Punch
Page 57 and 58:
K feldspar preservation to slightly
Page 59 and 60:
CONCLUSIONS 1. No quartz cementatio
Page 61 and 62:
The highest point of the island, is
Page 63 and 64:
STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK ONSHORE TO
Page 65 and 66:
STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK OF THE BARBADO
Page 67 and 68:
Sandy material is primarily quartz
Page 69 and 70:
esult of extension caused by flexur
Page 71 and 72:
1994). The origin of the Oceanic Fo
Page 73 and 74: Oligocene-age sediments are deposit
Page 75 and 76: The observation of channel geometri
Page 77 and 78: Pudsey, (1982) interpreted smectite
Page 79 and 80: The interpretation of the Scotland
Page 81 and 82: Figure 1.2: Convergent margins arou
Page 83 and 84: NSF Study Lines Grenada St. Kitts S
Page 85 and 86: Figure 2.2: Generalized vertical se
Page 87 and 88: Figure 2.4: Detailed Geological map
Page 89 and 90: Figure 2.6: Photographs and illustr
Page 91 and 92: Figure 2.8: Bedsets on the channel
Page 93 and 94: S 50 m Figure 2.10: Photo-panorama
Page 95 and 96: Figure 2.13: Laminated silt and mud
Page 97 and 98: Figure 2.16a: Measured section at C
Page 99 and 100: Figure 2.16c: Measured section at C
Page 101 and 102: Figure 2.18: Correlation of section
Page 103 and 104: Figure 2.21: Parallel laminated sil
Page 105 and 106: Wach, Vincent and Chaderton March 2
Page 111 and 112: Figure 2.24: Channel element identi
Page 113 and 114: WRB S N Fresh rock face exposed by
Page 115 and 116: Figure 2.28: Photograph of Diplocra
Page 117 and 118: Figure 2.31: Conglomerate with eros
Page 119 and 120: Figure 2.33: Thalassinoides trace f
Page 121 and 122: Figure 2.35: Mount All measured str
Page 123: Figure 2.37: Medium grained sand be
Page 127 and 128: Figure 2.38d: Inner Turner’s Hall
Page 129 and 130: Figure 2.39: Spa Hill measured stra
Page 131 and 132: Juniper Ridge, California Scotland
Page 133 and 134: Figure 3.1: Fractured quartz grain
Page 135 and 136: SGRF 1C SGRF 9C Figure 3.5: Measure
Page 137 and 138: Figure 3.8: Photo of sample SGRF 11
Page 139 and 140: Figure 3.10: Photo of sample SGRF 1
Page 141 and 142: Figure 3.12: Photo of sample WRA 16
Page 143 and 144: Figure 3.14: Photo of sample WRB 8
Page 145 and 146: Figure 3.16: Photo of sample ITR 9
Page 147 and 148: Figure 3.19: Photo of sample CMRA s
Page 149 and 150: Figure 3. 23: Composition of Scotla
Page 151 and 152: Figure 4.1: Base map showing seismi
Page 153 and 154: Figure 4.3: Channels within Unit Fi
Page 155 and 156: Figure 4.5: Seismic reflection prof
Page 157 and 158: Figure 4.7 Isochron maps of the old
Page 159 and 160: Figure 4.9: Illustration of the Spe
Page 161 and 162: Figure 4.11: Illustration of Hypoth
Page 163 and 164: necessary to clear a path. Keep to
Page 165 and 166: 2006 Figure A.2a: Lidar Ridge measu
Page 167 and 168: Figure A.3b: Chalky Mount Ridge mea
Page 169 and 170: 2006 Figure A.4a: Chalky Mount Ridg
Page 171 and 172: 2006 Figure A.4c: Chalky Mount Ridg
Page 173 and 174: 2006 Figure A.6: Chalky Mount Ridge
Page 175 and 176:
Figure A.7b: Measured Section of Ch
Page 177 and 178:
2006 Figure A.8a: Sleeping Giant Ri
Page 179 and 180:
2006 Figure A.9: Sleeping Giant Rid
Page 181 and 182:
2006 Figure A.11: Sleeping Giant Ri
Page 183 and 184:
Figure A.13a: Sleeping Giant Ridge
Page 185 and 186:
2006 Figure A.14a: Coast Road Below
Page 187 and 188:
2006 Figure A.14c: Coast Road Below
Page 189 and 190:
2006 Figure A.14e: Coast Road Below
Page 191 and 192:
2006 Figure A.14g: Coast Road Below
Page 193 and 194:
2006 Figure A.15: Ermy Bourne Ridge
Page 195 and 196:
2006 Figure A.17: Spa Hill Fold Mea
Page 197 and 198:
2006 Figure A.19: Ermy Bourne Ridge
Page 199 and 200:
Figure A.20b: Walkers Ridge Measure
Page 201 and 202:
Figure A.21: Walkers Ridge Measured
Page 203 and 204:
Figure A.22b: Walkers Ridge Measure
Page 205 and 206:
2007 Figure A.23b: Inner Turner’s
Page 207 and 208:
2007 Figure A.23d: Inner Turner’s
Page 209 and 210:
Framework grains Quartz Feldspar Ro
Page 211 and 212:
CRIMES, T.P., 1977, Trace fossils o
Page 213 and 214:
MONTGOMERY, S.L., BARKER, C.E., SEA
Page 215 and 216:
RICHARDS, M., BOWMAN, M., and READI
Page 217 and 218:
WEBER, J.C., DIXON, T.H., DEMETS, C
show all

Copyright by Nysha Chaderton 2009 - The University of Texas at ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?