Download - Royal Australian Navy
Download - Royal Australian Navy
Download - Royal Australian Navy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
64 NAVY ENGINEERING BULLETIN SEPTEMBER 2003<br />
aircraft are damaged during<br />
combat than lost completely.<br />
Through the application of rapid<br />
repair techniques, ABDR can<br />
return a damaged aircraft to<br />
service in the shortest possible<br />
time frame, whether the aircraft<br />
has been rendered unserviceable<br />
due to structural or system<br />
damage. ABDR employs locally<br />
designed, authorised and applied<br />
repairs utilising non-standard<br />
materials, tools and equipment in<br />
order to minimise aircraft<br />
downtime.<br />
ABDR is not an acceptable<br />
peacetime maintenance action,<br />
but can be used under certain<br />
circumstances to quickly repair a<br />
damaged aircraft so it can be<br />
flown out of further harms way.<br />
Implementing CMAINT and ABDR<br />
is a prerogative of the<br />
operational commander when<br />
contingencies are declared or<br />
warlike situations encountered. A<br />
potential downside for<br />
implementing CMAINT or ABDR<br />
is that the aircraft must be able<br />
to be returned to peacetime<br />
standards if required, once the<br />
contingency is over. Where<br />
CMAINT conditions have been<br />
implemented over a protracted<br />
period or the aircraft has<br />
undertaken a significant<br />
workload under such conditions,<br />
a considerable maintenance<br />
effort may be needed to properly<br />
complete any structural repairs<br />
and re-establish scheduled<br />
maintenance programs.<br />
So why has the RAN Aviation<br />
community suddenly started<br />
focusing on ABDR, and how<br />
does it impact our<br />
preparedness for combat?<br />
In early 2002 two separate<br />
aircraft structural repair<br />
instances highlighted a<br />
deficiency in the airframe repair<br />
capability of RAN ships’ Flights.<br />
Both instances were<br />
satisfactorily resolved by the<br />
Fleet Air Arm’s Mobile Aircraft<br />
Support Team (MAST), but<br />
arguably should have fallen<br />
within the capabilities of the<br />
ships’ Flights. Investigations<br />
revealed that both Flights lacked<br />
the required proficiency,<br />
confidence, and in some<br />
instances tooling and<br />
consumables to conduct the<br />
necessary repairs. This situation<br />
presented a significant capability<br />
risk. Central to this situation was<br />
an historical reliance to call on<br />
contractor assistance almost<br />
every time a complex airframe<br />
structural repair was required to<br />
be expediently completed at<br />
NAS Nowra. This practice had<br />
resulted in a subsequent 'deskilling'<br />
of the AT workforce.<br />
To rectify this situation, staff<br />
within the Fleet Aviation<br />
Engineering Unit (FAEU) set<br />
about assessing the existing level<br />
of tooling, material and AT<br />
sheetmetal repair skills in the<br />
embarked environment, and then<br />
compared the existing capability<br />
to what is required of an<br />
embarked ABDR/SMR baseline<br />
capability. The overall intention of<br />
the review was to ensure ships<br />
Flights were able to carry out, as<br />
a minimum, repairs detailed in<br />
the aircraft specific Structural<br />
Repair Manuals. Training and<br />
competency in the concept of<br />
ABDR, although not an initial<br />
focus, was also an objective.<br />
So where to begin?<br />
As with any situation, the ability<br />
to operate safely outside<br />
specified standard procedures<br />
requires a thorough<br />
understanding of, and ability to<br />
correctly carry out, those<br />
procedures. Therefore, in order to<br />
carry out CMAINT and ABDR<br />
procedures personnel must first<br />
have an in-depth understanding<br />
of electrical and structural repairs<br />
carried out with all the necessary<br />
resources and in accordance with<br />
approved standard procedures.<br />
FAEU Staff, in conjunction with<br />
ABDR is not an acceptable<br />
peacetime maintenance<br />
action, but can be used<br />
under certain circumstances<br />
to quickly repair a damaged<br />
aircraft so it can be flown<br />
out of further harms way.<br />
Training Authority - Aviation (TA-<br />
AVN) and the ABDR School at<br />
RAAF Williamtown, devised a<br />
method for evaluating a Flights’<br />
structural repair capability,<br />
including their understanding of<br />
existing procedures. The<br />
evaluation employed the use of a<br />
'repair simulator' that replicated a<br />
section of an aircraft's structure,<br />
incorporating skin, frames,<br />
stringers, hydraulic lines and<br />
electrical looms. The simulators<br />
were employed during a ship’s<br />
Work-up and Unit Readiness<br />
Evaluation (URE) and were predamaged<br />
to reflect varying<br />
degrees of ‘battle damage’<br />
expected to be sustained during<br />
a contingency scenario. The<br />
simulators were required to be<br />
repaired by the ship's Flight<br />
within a specified time frame,<br />
with technical personnel ‘thinking<br />
outside the box’ where necessary.<br />
The repair capability deficiencies<br />
identified by the exercises<br />
provided a clear indication of<br />
where efforts should be expended<br />
in order to improve a Flights’<br />
repair capabilities. Typical<br />
examples of the simulators and<br />
damage are shown in figures<br />
1to4.