20.07.2013 Views

A Grammar of Miya - UCLA Department of Linguistics

A Grammar of Miya - UCLA Department of Linguistics

A Grammar of Miya - UCLA Department of Linguistics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

304 A <strong>Grammar</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Miya</strong><br />

mon kUwa zuw-aa aa magirbi<br />

I-Pf harvest sorghum-pIn with hoe<br />

man kUwa zUw aa njg<br />

a dam aatSffi aa bazakway<br />

Pf do singing with harp<br />

ndilwul baa dO, diya sap;m aa fiy<br />

pot that Pf cook tuwo with it<br />

'I harvested sorghum with a hoe'<br />

'I harvested sorghum with it'<br />

'he sang with a harp'<br />

'the pot that she cooked tuwo with (it)'<br />

mgn aa-taa diy-ilws aa16 Nayra vaatla 'he owes me 1'15.00'<br />

I Ipf follow-him with Naira five ('I am following him with 1'15.00')<br />

dO, danga-tl(a) aa yaaree aa vana mfy 'they spoke to her in the <strong>Miya</strong> language'<br />

Sjn speak-to her with language with mouth <strong>Miya</strong><br />

kwaa biy bay-tla haa-tlgn ka, dO, dama 'am-a aa nja<br />

when Prt take-her place-their when Sjn 00 wife-pIn with her<br />

'when they take her home, they make a wife out <strong>of</strong> her'<br />

1.6. Comitatives: prepositions 'anda' or 'afda'<br />

1.6.1. Simple comitatives. Comitative phrases use the prepositions ',nda' or ' ,fda',<br />

which are completely interchangeable. They both have a final floating L, which replaces<br />

the tone <strong>of</strong> the following domain (3:§4). These same prepositions conjoin noun phrasesl7<br />

See 10:§6 for discussion <strong>of</strong> this function as well as examples <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> the floating L<br />

and a note on the historical origin <strong>of</strong> the two fonns. Phrases with 'anaa' or 'ajda' can be<br />

used as simple adjunct phrases meaning 'in the company <strong>of</strong>, with'. Pronominal objects use<br />

the independent pronouns (8:§1.1).<br />

a 'ar(a) ee-wutay 'gnaa nly azak-uwsa 'he will prepare (beer) with his uncles'<br />

Ft prepare at-one with &Co uncle-his<br />

a dam aacam 'gnaa tuly 'he did work with us'<br />

Pf do work with us<br />

jee dgnga-y(a) aa yaaree ';,iaa fiy<br />

then speak-to him with language with him<br />

'they spoke in (their native) language with him'<br />

16The H on the preposition may be explained by LOW RAISING, which raises the first syllable <strong>of</strong> a L<br />

domain after L if the L domain does not begin in a voiced obstruent-3:§3.4.<br />

17Note that <strong>Miya</strong> uses different markers for the conjoining function ('and' and comitative 'with') and<br />

instrumental 'with'. In a text from one speaker (a young man), I did find some examples <strong>of</strong> what appears to<br />

be instrumental aa used in conjoining and comitative functions, e.g. aa Mamman aa Laoee da var-dy<br />

aavuwdgwahfy 'both (aa) Mamman and (aa) Labe ran <strong>of</strong>f to the town', I-da d'ama awree aa Laoee 'he will<br />

marry Labe' (he wiU do marriage with (aa) Labe). This same speaker used 'fmda' in this function as well<br />

(examples in §§1.6.1-2 which include the name Mdmman are from the same text). No speakers ever used<br />

'?mda' or 'afda' in the instrumental function.<br />

11. The Syntax <strong>of</strong> Simplex Clauses (§§1.4-J3)<br />

jOe tl-uwsa ';,iaa'an tuwso 'Maa wiltlamfy niywasa J8 gan tiy<br />

then arise-ICP with wne his and children his even him<br />

'then he sets out with his wife and children and himself included'<br />

nja d-aa-taa (a)tavi da gama 'anaa Manunan<br />

she da-Ct traveling Sjn meet with Mamman<br />

'she was traveling along and she met up with Manunan'<br />

ganaa ZUW-YYITl a-kan 'gmm wun mrn<br />

Hrt-me leave-you (fs) Lac-home with daughter your (fs)<br />

'let me leave you (fs) at home with your daughter'<br />

1.6.2. Asymmetric coordination. When two referents are engaged in a single<br />

activity, <strong>Miya</strong> is like many other Chadic languages in preferring a construction referred to<br />

in Schwartz (1989) as "asymmetric coordination". In this construction type, a plural<br />

pronoun appears in the appropriate functional position (usually subject, direct object, or<br />

indirect object), then the name <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the referents or a singular pronoun referring to one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the referents appears in a comitative phrase. This structure takes the following<br />

interpretation, where X and Y are single individuals, not groups:<br />

... Pronoun[plural = X + Yj ... ',naa Y<br />

... XandY ...<br />

Pronouns for the plural and comitative phrases are chosen as follows:<br />

• The plural pronoun will be first person if the speaker is included, it will be second<br />

person if the addressee but not the speaker is included, and it will be third person<br />

otherwise.<br />

• If either one <strong>of</strong> the referents is third person, the comitative phrase will have a third<br />

person singular pronoun.<br />

• If one <strong>of</strong> the referents is first person and the other one second, the second person is in<br />

the comitative phrase.<br />

• If both are second person or both are third person, the pragmatically "subordinate"<br />

referent will be in the comitative phrase. For example, in <strong>Miya</strong> courting, it is the man<br />

who initiates the pursuit <strong>of</strong> a spouse rather than the woman. In asymmetric<br />

coordination involving a courter and a courtee, it is therefore the woman who will be in<br />

the comitative phrase.<br />

Asymmetric coordinate constructions are not obligatory even when the pragmatic<br />

conditions are met for their use, i.e. a simple conjoined noun phrase may appear in<br />

functional position in question (10:§6) or the first pronoun may be singular (see examples<br />

inunediately above in §1.6.1). However, examples from texts show a preference for<br />

asymmetric coordination when one <strong>of</strong> the referents is expressed pronominally. Although<br />

sentences like the following are potentially ambiguous between two referents or more than<br />

two, the first interpretation (with no context provided) is invariably that <strong>of</strong> two referents.<br />

18Since 'fjfda' is both the comitative preposition and the conjoiner <strong>of</strong> nouns, this phrase is structuralIy<br />

ambiguous between two comitatives and conjoined noun phrases within a comitative phrase.<br />

305

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!