October 2007 Volume 10 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...
October 2007 Volume 10 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...
October 2007 Volume 10 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In the third section, factor analytical techniques were used to determine the underlying structure of teachers’<br />
responses to items. Principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotations was employed for the factor analysis. The<br />
results for both the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (0.85) and the Bartlett Test of Sphericity<br />
(χ2 =6803.8, N = 613, p < 0.0001) were significant, indicating that factor analysis was suitable for this sample. By<br />
using Cattell’s screen test and examining the factor loadings of the items, we removed 13 items from the<br />
questionnaire: five factors emerged. According to the pattern of correlation between and among items and factors,<br />
we assigned a descriptive name to each of the factors. The factors arrived at were: (1) belief in the use of computing<br />
technology in classrooms (e.g., “I believe that technology-based instruction can improve learning achievement”); (2)<br />
high degree of interactive use of technology (e.g., “I have had students learn collaboratively through the Internet”);<br />
(3) technical and personnel resources available in a given teacher’s school (e.g., “In my school, there are enough<br />
technicians to maintain computers”); (4) low degree of interactive use of technology (e.g., “I have used computers to<br />
play videos in classrooms”); and (5) attitude toward technology-based instruction (e.g., “Learning software will not<br />
make me nervous and uncomfortable”). The validity values of the factors (eigen values) were 4.82, 2.13, 1.73, 1.24,<br />
and 1.01. The factor loadings of the 24 items ranged from 0.53 to 0.70, and 58% of the variations were included<br />
within the five factors (see details in Table 2). As shown in Table 2, the composite reliability coefficients were<br />
ranged from 0.69 to 0.89 and the overall instrument reliability reached 0.87. Therefore, the reliability of the<br />
instrument was established.<br />
Data Analysis<br />
We used frequency analysis to show the distribution of teachers in different stages of instructional evolution and<br />
MANOVA techniques to examine correlations and interactions between two factors (teaching seniority and the stage<br />
of computer-based instructional evolution) on five measures (beliefs, high-level interactive practices, technical and<br />
personnel resources, low-level interactive practices, and attitudes). The stepwise method of multiple linear regression<br />
was applied to indicate the relationships between and among these variables. The calculations to determine the<br />
coefficients of regression models and MANOVA were performed through the application of the SPSS 12.0 package.<br />
No. Items and Factors<br />
Table 2. Questionnaire Items and Factor Loading<br />
Factor<br />
Loading<br />
Average<br />
variance<br />
extracted<br />
Composite<br />
reliability<br />
Subscale score<br />
Mean S.D.<br />
Belief 0.53 0.89<br />
e19 I think technology is helpful for my teaching. 0.73 3.60 0.73<br />
e26 I believe that technology-based instruction can improve<br />
learning achievement.<br />
0.71 3.51 0.78<br />
e9 I think technology-based instruction is one of the future trends<br />
in education.<br />
0.69 3.93 0.76<br />
e27 I believe that technology-based instruction can make my<br />
teaching more lively and energetic.<br />
0.68 3.89 0.67<br />
e21 I should create different teaching strategies for technologybased<br />
instruction.<br />
0.68 3.74 0.67<br />
e25 I believe that technology-based teaching can increase students’<br />
motivation.<br />
0.68 3.81 0.66<br />
e20 Using technology can help me share my teaching experiences<br />
with others.<br />
0.68 3.59 0.68<br />
e<strong>10</strong> I am willing to follow school policy on implementing<br />
technology-based instruction.<br />
0.66 3.80 0.71<br />
e22 I should develop different assessment strategies for technologybased<br />
instruction.<br />
0.63 3.72 0.68<br />
e1 I believe that conventional teaching methods are more efficient<br />
than technology-based instruction.<br />
0.54 3.35 0.85<br />
High-interaction practices (behaviors) 0.70 0.84<br />
e35 I have designed activities that allow students to learn through<br />
0.84 2.97 1.04<br />
the Internet.<br />
e36 I have had students learn collaboratively through the Internet. 0.84 2.86 1.02<br />
e37 I have used the Internet to support individual learning. 0.80 2.66 1.01<br />
e33 I have used computers and the Internet to collect and grade<br />
students’ assignments.<br />
0.72 3.24 1.09<br />
121