08.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1659] NON-RESIDEFTS—FREEMEN—HIGHWAYS. 87<br />

thentick and othei-s not tlier shall loose ther votes. And allsoe be f<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

1'* if they bee not at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the meete<strong>in</strong>g when it is orderly<br />

begun."<br />

This order rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged for twenty years, when<br />

the nnniber constitut<strong>in</strong>g a quori<strong>in</strong>i was <strong>in</strong>creased to thirty,<br />

and absentees were f<strong>in</strong>ed 12d. each.<br />

First Sale <strong>of</strong> Home Among the arrivals <strong>in</strong> 1659, were George<br />

^°ts- Sumner, Enos K<strong>in</strong>gsley and Ralph Hutch<strong>in</strong>son.<br />

The first two named came <strong>from</strong><br />

Dorchester, and the last <strong>from</strong> Boston. To each <strong>of</strong> these men<br />

was granted for a home lot eight acres <strong>of</strong> upland, ly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on the " westerly side <strong>of</strong> y® Mill River." But by a special<br />

vote they were each required to pay twenty shill<strong>in</strong>gs to the<br />

"Townesmenat demand there<strong>of</strong>," and were also to build<br />

upon the lots and hold them four years, before obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a<br />

title. At a subsequent meet<strong>in</strong>g the amount to be paid for<br />

them was reduced to ten shill<strong>in</strong>gs, and the condition <strong>of</strong><br />

four year's possession repealed. This was the first <strong>in</strong>stance<br />

<strong>in</strong> which the town demanded payment for land granted to<br />

settlers. These were among the first home lots taken up<br />

on South Street. They were double the size <strong>of</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

home lots, situated at some distance <strong>from</strong> the settled por-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> the town, and by reason <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g river<br />

much more difficult <strong>of</strong> access. With these drawbacks it<br />

is not easy to understand why parties would be will<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

pay for land when everybody else had obta<strong>in</strong>ed it for noth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

It is possible that the size <strong>of</strong> the lots may have been<br />

the reason why a price was put upon them.<br />

William Smead, who came <strong>from</strong> Dorchester, had a grant,<br />

the next year, <strong>of</strong> eight acres <strong>of</strong> land for a home lot, on<br />

condition that he should pay ten shill<strong>in</strong>gs for it, as had the<br />

three men the year previous. His lot was laid out on South<br />

Street, adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g that <strong>of</strong> Ralph Hutch<strong>in</strong>son. Capt. Cook,<br />

Ensign Wilton and John Strong, were granted thirty acres<br />

apiece over Manhan River, <strong>in</strong> a parcel <strong>of</strong> land lately purchased<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Indians, or the same amount each, up Mill<br />

River ; they were also to have twenty acres apiece <strong>of</strong> upland<br />

upon the pla<strong>in</strong> beyond the mill. Here were 150 acres<br />

<strong>of</strong> land given away almost <strong>in</strong> the same vote that ordered<br />

Smead to pay ten shill<strong>in</strong>gs for his home lot.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!