08.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1661-1602] NEW MEETING HOUSE—HAMPSHIRE COUNTY. 135<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Soiitli Street lots, encircled Hurlljiirt's Pond, crossed<br />

Manlian River and extended to the place <strong>of</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

named <strong>in</strong> the records. The proportion <strong>of</strong> fence to the<br />

acre <strong>in</strong> the first division was six feet, and <strong>in</strong> the second,<br />

four feet n<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>ches. In the first division there were sixty-<br />

five owners, and <strong>in</strong> the second sixty-six.<br />

From this time onward the fence enclos<strong>in</strong>g the common<br />

field was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at the expense <strong>of</strong> the proprietors <strong>of</strong><br />

the meadow land. While the position <strong>of</strong> the fence rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

suljstantially as given above, new regulations and<br />

adjustments to changed ownership became necessary <strong>from</strong><br />

time to time. These are all detailed upon the records, and<br />

the more important features <strong>of</strong> them will be presented <strong>in</strong><br />

the future pages <strong>of</strong> this work.<br />

First Burial Place. The first death <strong>in</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong> occurred <strong>in</strong><br />

Bridge Street 1655 Jamcs, <strong>in</strong>fant son <strong>of</strong> James Bridg-<br />

man, died on the 14"' <strong>of</strong> June. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

next three years five deaths were registered. Where these<br />

dead were buried is not known. In February, 1659, the<br />

town voted "that the bury<strong>in</strong>g place shalbee upon the<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g howse hill," and it is probable that all <strong>in</strong>terments<br />

to that time had been made there. The selection <strong>of</strong> this<br />

place so near the meet<strong>in</strong>g house, was undoubtedly <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />

with the system <strong>of</strong> parish church yards that prevailed<br />

<strong>in</strong> their old English homes. Three years after, when<br />

the new meet<strong>in</strong>g house was located upon another site, it<br />

wfts concluded to change the position <strong>of</strong> the bury<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ground.' But eleven deaths had been recorded up to the<br />

commencement <strong>of</strong> the year 1661. A committee, chosen <strong>in</strong><br />

that year "to f<strong>in</strong>de out a convenient place for y* vse," reported,<br />

April 23, 1662, <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> a position on Bridge<br />

Street, "at the furthest corner <strong>of</strong> the Sequestered Mynis-<br />

ters Lott wher M'^ Jeanes was buried." Mary, wife <strong>of</strong><br />

William Janes, died April 4, 1662, and was probably buried<br />

there <strong>in</strong> anticipation <strong>of</strong> the determ<strong>in</strong>ation to use this lot<br />

for such a purpose. The portion <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>ister's lot se-<br />

1 " Their bury<strong>in</strong>g place is stated to have been on the meet<strong>in</strong>g house hill until the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> October, 1661. I mention this as pro<strong>of</strong> that bury<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the centers <strong>of</strong> towns<br />

by the side <strong>of</strong> their churches, was orig<strong>in</strong>ally the common custom <strong>of</strong> New England.<br />

This custom pla<strong>in</strong>ly had <strong>its</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the superstitious <strong>of</strong> the Romish Chun'h, which<br />

attributed a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> sanctity to a cemetery consecrated by a clergyman.—Dwight's<br />

Travels <strong>in</strong> N. E., 1821. vol. 1, p. 345.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!