08.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

404 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1689.<br />

that all vacancies should forthwith be filled up <strong>of</strong> meet persons<br />

to be nom<strong>in</strong>ated by the householders and soldiers <strong>of</strong><br />

such company." John K<strong>in</strong>g, who that year served as representative,<br />

brought the order. The contention was<br />

whether the old <strong>of</strong>ficers—Capt. Aaron Cook, Lieut. Joseph<br />

Hawley, and Ensign Timothy Baker^r-commissioned <strong>in</strong><br />

1686, should cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> command, or a new list be chosen.<br />

Major Pynchon, as commander <strong>in</strong> the county, and <strong>in</strong> obedience<br />

to the order <strong>of</strong> the authorities, renewed their commissions,<br />

while the company and the town were <strong>in</strong> favor<br />

<strong>of</strong> another election.<br />

M e d a d Pomeroy's Medad Pomeroy took an active part <strong>in</strong> this<br />

Letter concerniug coutest and addressed several letters to the<br />

the DifSculty. j_t •j_- • j^ e i- i<br />

authorities m tavor or an entirely new se-<br />

lection. In his first letter <strong>of</strong> July 18"', he represented that<br />

Capt. Cook was no longer a citizen <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, that<br />

Lieut. Hawley was not satisfactory to the company, on account<br />

<strong>of</strong> the manner <strong>in</strong> which he obta<strong>in</strong>ed ^he <strong>of</strong>fice, and<br />

that Ensign Baker had never accepted the commission.<br />

The trouble with the last two named <strong>of</strong>ficers dated l)ack to<br />

the spr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 1686. He represented that the capta<strong>in</strong> at<br />

that time promised the company that they would be allowed<br />

to choose their own <strong>of</strong>ficers. But that he came with commissions<br />

for Lieut. Hawley and Ensign Baker, without<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g consulted the company or the persons whose places<br />

were to be filled. [The vacancy <strong>in</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> lieutenant<br />

was caused by the resignation <strong>of</strong> Lieut. William Clarke,<br />

and the ensign had some idea <strong>of</strong> remov<strong>in</strong>g to Northfield.]<br />

The commission to Mr. Hawley was delivered to him at<br />

that time, "though the company then manifested much<br />

dislike to the same. " The ensign then <strong>in</strong> commission ' ''<br />

terly refused to deliver up the colors to the Capta<strong>in</strong>'s order,<br />

and men's spir<strong>its</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g at that time <strong>in</strong> such a heat it was evident<br />

it was no season to take the colors away by force." A<br />

petition was sent to the General Court soon after, concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

this trouble, but the change <strong>in</strong> government occurred<br />

before any action was taken. When the order came <strong>in</strong><br />

1689, he says that the selectmen aj^plied to Mr. Hawley "to<br />

see when or whether he would call a meet<strong>in</strong>g for nom<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Capta<strong>in</strong> and other military <strong>of</strong>ficers, because then<br />

ut

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!