08.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

342 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1076.<br />

field, <strong>in</strong>tend<strong>in</strong>g to lay <strong>in</strong> for one week." Previous to the<br />

11*'', Lieut. Leff<strong>in</strong>gwell with "40 or 45 horse," was ordered<br />

to W<strong>in</strong>dsor to br<strong>in</strong>g up what bread could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>of</strong><br />

Dea. Moore, a baker at that place. Major Talcott awaited<br />

the tardy movements <strong>of</strong> Capt. Henchman and the Massa-<br />

chusetts troops for about one week, send<strong>in</strong>g messenger af-<br />

ter messenger to hurry them forward. Dur<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>terval<br />

he reports no movements aga<strong>in</strong>st the enemy, no attempt<br />

to ascerta<strong>in</strong> whether the statements <strong>of</strong> his prisoners were<br />

true or false. He did not apparently employ his time <strong>in</strong> ef-<br />

forts to obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>telligence <strong>of</strong> his foes, but rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

camp, quiet and <strong>in</strong>active.<br />

The Plans <strong>of</strong> the The Indians were undoubtedly aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />

English undoubt- movemcuts <strong>of</strong> the troops. Both Talcott<br />

the Indians, and and Hcuchman had encountered parties <strong>of</strong><br />

they assume the them, had slaiu and captured some, while<br />

ggresbive.<br />

others had escaped. From these they must<br />

have learned enough to surmise that the two detachments<br />

were <strong>in</strong>tended for united action when they reached the val-<br />

ley. Know<strong>in</strong>g that the English forces had not yet effected<br />

a junction, they devised an attack upon the town <strong>of</strong> Hadley,<br />

hop<strong>in</strong>g no doubt to <strong>in</strong>flict serious damage before the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> the troops.<br />

T h e Attack upon Ou the momiug <strong>of</strong> June 12"', the enemy<br />

Hadiey. appeared <strong>in</strong> force before Hadley, and made<br />

a vigorous attack upon the place. Capt.<br />

Swa<strong>in</strong> was <strong>in</strong> command. About seven hundred ^ Indians,<br />

<strong>in</strong> two divisions, <strong>in</strong>vested the town on opposite sides. They<br />

were discovered about an hour after sunrise. Three unarmed<br />

soldiers, who went outside the fortifications on the<br />

south side <strong>of</strong> the town, contrary to orders, were sla<strong>in</strong>. A<br />

detachment was immediately sent out aga<strong>in</strong>st the enemy,<br />

who fled on the approach <strong>of</strong> the soldiers.<br />

1 This seems to have been the stock number <strong>of</strong> Indians <strong>in</strong> all these attacks. Seven<br />

hundred was reported as the number engaged <strong>in</strong> the attack on Hatfield, May 30, and<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> seven hundred <strong>in</strong> this raid on Hadley. Mr. Judd says : " there may have been<br />

250 Indians engaged <strong>in</strong> this enterprise. * * * There were not at this time 700 hos-<br />

tile Indian warriors <strong>in</strong> <strong>Massachusetts</strong>."—<strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hadley, pp. 178, 179, note.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!