08.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER XXXVI.<br />

HATFIELD BOUNDARY—OVERSEERS OF THE POOR.<br />

Boundary L<strong>in</strong>e with The bouiidarv betweeii <strong>Northampton</strong> and<br />

Hatfield <strong>in</strong> Dis- Hatfield was tliG causG <strong>of</strong> a lengthened dis-<br />

^" ^'<br />

agreement between the towns, and the oc-<br />

casion <strong>of</strong> several su<strong>its</strong> at law between certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> their citi-<br />

zens. It commenced <strong>in</strong> 1694, and was not settled for a quar-<br />

ter <strong>of</strong> a century. This controversy seems to have been occasioned<br />

by a proposition <strong>from</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong> to perambu-<br />

late the boundary l<strong>in</strong>e. From the Hatfield records it ap-<br />

pears that the dissatisfaction was mutual, though subsequent<br />

entries upon those <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, <strong>in</strong>dicate that an<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the old l<strong>in</strong>e was all that was then <strong>in</strong>-<br />

tended. Hatfield, <strong>in</strong> reply to this suggestion, stated that<br />

application had already been made to <strong>Northampton</strong> for an<br />

alteration <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>e, at the same time demand<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

they "must have more full satisfaction where the l<strong>in</strong>e shal<br />

go before we run the l<strong>in</strong>e," and specify<strong>in</strong>g the desired<br />

changes. <strong>Northampton</strong>, however, <strong>in</strong>sisted upon a survey<br />

<strong>of</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e. Hatfield <strong>of</strong>l:ered to run the l<strong>in</strong>e accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the grant <strong>of</strong> the General Court. Apparently no<br />

attention was paid to this overture by <strong>Northampton</strong>, and<br />

<strong>in</strong> February, 169^, a sharp letter was forwarded to the selectmen<br />

<strong>of</strong> this town, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>Northampton</strong> was accused<br />

<strong>of</strong> neglect<strong>in</strong>g to settle the bounds. Hatfield was will<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

run the l<strong>in</strong>e accord<strong>in</strong>g to the records, <strong>from</strong> Capawonke<br />

meadow n<strong>in</strong>e miles on a west l<strong>in</strong>e, argu<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

"as to your pretended <strong>settlement</strong> <strong>of</strong> bounds with Hadley, there was<br />

not then, has not been s<strong>in</strong>ce any grant <strong>of</strong> court <strong>of</strong> such bounds to you<br />

or Hadley ; and lay<strong>in</strong>g out such l<strong>in</strong>e can give you no title to the land.<br />

Hatfield had the first grant <strong>of</strong> said land, and we are wronged by your<br />

cutt<strong>in</strong>g wood and timber on said land. Your neglect may occasion<br />

much disturbance and law sii<strong>its</strong>, and be <strong>of</strong> ill report. We desire to<br />

know whether you will run the l<strong>in</strong>e accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Coru't's grant<br />

or no."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!