08.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

,<br />

1675] KING Philip's war—raid on <strong>Northampton</strong>. 271<br />

seph Baker, and Joseph Baker Jr., were at work <strong>in</strong> the<br />

meadow, and that is all that is 'positively known concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the place or manner <strong>of</strong> their deaths. After the attack<br />

on the men <strong>in</strong> Pynchon's Meadow, it is not probable that<br />

two men and a boy would have ventured very far <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

meadows unprotected. In the same paragraph ^ which<br />

notes the kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> these persons, it is stated that the In-<br />

dians attempted to burn the mill, but it was so well defended<br />

that they were unable to effect their purpose. This<br />

mill was probably the one built <strong>in</strong> 1671, at Red Rocks. If<br />

this was the mill attacked, it is quite probable that the<br />

meadow <strong>in</strong> which the men were killed was the small one at<br />

the upper or western end <strong>of</strong> "Paradise." They were probably<br />

not very far <strong>from</strong> the mill, which it seems was well<br />

guarded, and undoubtedly considered themselves with<strong>in</strong><br />

hail<strong>in</strong>g distance <strong>of</strong> succor, should the enemy appear. From<br />

the fact that the Indians at once assaulted the mill, it may<br />

be <strong>in</strong>ferred that the men were killed very near it, be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

discovered by the enemy while on their way to the attack.<br />

The Persons Killed. Two <strong>of</strong> thcse last victims Were men prom<strong>in</strong>ent<br />

<strong>in</strong> the <strong>settlement</strong>, and could not readily<br />

be spared. Joseph Baker was the son <strong>of</strong> Edward Baker,<br />

and lived on Elm Street. His home lot was on the opposite<br />

side <strong>of</strong> the street <strong>from</strong> the lot orig<strong>in</strong>ally granted to his<br />

father, and comprised the property on both sides <strong>of</strong> what<br />

is now Henshaw Avenue. Joseph Baker Jr., his son, was<br />

a lad but ten years <strong>of</strong> age. Thomas Salmon was an origi-<br />

nal settler, and had a home lot on Meet<strong>in</strong>g House Hill,<br />

which he sold <strong>in</strong> 1668.<br />

Danger Everywhere. While the foe was tlius Constantly skulk-<br />

The Savage Foe<br />

on the Alert.<br />

j^g about, the plantation was <strong>in</strong> a state <strong>of</strong><br />

, .<br />

t^ tit<br />

great excitement. Danger lurked on every<br />

side. Men had been shot and scalped almost with<strong>in</strong> sight<br />

<strong>of</strong> their own doors, and the good-wife, when her husband<br />

went forth to his daily toil, knew not that she should ever<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> behold him liv<strong>in</strong>g. Though the town swarmed with<br />

soldiers, they were powerless to protect. No part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>settlement</strong> was safe. Watch<strong>in</strong>g every opportunity, the en-<br />

1 Rev. Mr. Williams' Historical Seimou.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!