10.08.2013 Views

A Wavelength Converter Integrated with a Discretely Tunable Laser ...

A Wavelength Converter Integrated with a Discretely Tunable Laser ...

A Wavelength Converter Integrated with a Discretely Tunable Laser ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 2. <strong>Wavelength</strong> converter overview<br />

Zehnder interferometer (MZI). Compared to XGM, XPM allows for lower optical powers,<br />

lower chirp, larger extinction ratio and reduced wavelength dependency.<br />

The XPM based wavelength conversion methods are described below. We focus on integrated<br />

devices that employ SOAs as the non-linear element, because integrated devices are much more<br />

stable and compact than their fiber based counter parts. In addition, fiber based converters<br />

suffer from a difference in arm length, resulting in a reduced wavelength bandwidth [13].<br />

Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI)<br />

<strong>Wavelength</strong> conversion in a MZI <strong>with</strong> SOAs (Fig. 2.3) works as follows: A probe at wavelength<br />

is injected in the MZI and split in two parts. Each part propagates through a<br />

different arms of the MZI. Next, the two parts are recombined again interferometrically and<br />

the resulting probe output power depends on the phase difference between the two arms. The<br />

output is minimum for destructive interference and maximum for constructive interference.<br />

Consequently, the probe output power can be switched by modulating the phase difference<br />

between the two MZI arms. This is realized by injecting a control signal into the SOA in one<br />

of the arms. The control signal can be injected either co-propagating or counter-propagating<br />

<strong>with</strong> the probe. In counter-propagating conversion no filters are needed at the converter output<br />

to separate the control signal from the probe, but the bit-rate is limited to ¤ Gb/s [14].<br />

In co-propagating mode, the bit rate is limited to ¤ - Gb/s by the carrier recovery time in<br />

the SOA. The limited carrier recovery causes inter-symbol interference for bit rates beyond<br />

the SOA bandwidth. <strong>Converter</strong>s have been fabricated using active layers of either bulk material<br />

[14–19] or multi-quantum well (MQW) material [20–22]. MQW layers require normally<br />

less injection current than bulk, while a bulk layer is advantageous for the reproducible fabrication<br />

of polarization independent behavior. The lengths of the SOAs that were reported in<br />

literature range between 500i and 1200 , and their injection current typically varies<br />

between 100 mA and 280 mA. Static extinction ratios of the converted output of dB and<br />

extinction ratio improvements of up to ¤ dB have been reported [22, 23]. An extinction ratio<br />

of over 30 dB was reported in [24]. In dynamical operation, the extinction ratio varies between<br />

13 dB at 2.5 Gb/s to around 10 dB at 10 Gb/s [14, 20, 25]. The typical control signal input<br />

λprobe<br />

SOA<br />

SOA<br />

λcontrol<br />

λconverted<br />

P<br />

ISRR OSNR<br />

λcontrol<br />

ASE<br />

λconverted<br />

Figure 2.3: a) Illustration of a MZI wavelength converter. A counter propagation scheme<br />

is shown. b) An illustration of an output spectrum from the converter that explains the Input<br />

Signal Rejection Ratio (ISRR) and the Optical Signal to Noise Ratio (OSNR).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!