11.08.2013 Views

Micro-gasification: Cooking with gas from biomass - Amper

Micro-gasification: Cooking with gas from biomass - Amper

Micro-gasification: Cooking with gas from biomass - Amper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Micro</strong>-<strong><strong>gas</strong>ification</strong>: <strong>Cooking</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>gas</strong> <strong>from</strong> dry <strong>biomass</strong><br />

Some burner units can be fitted into existing stove structures, broadening the options of<br />

fuel and enable the choice of fuel type according to what is available at the moment.<br />

Some <strong>gas</strong>ifier stoves can easily be fitted <strong>with</strong> a heat resistant glass of a paraffin lamp so<br />

that they can provide light during operation. This is a good argument when users resist<br />

to change <strong>from</strong> the open fire to an enclosed fire chamber because of the loss of light to<br />

brighten the cooking space.<br />

Not enough data are yet available to quantify emissions and fuel consumption of different<br />

micro-<strong>gas</strong>ifier models. Some tests like the 5-litre Water-boiling tests to determine<br />

fuel consumption are not applicable to certain batch-feed micro-<strong>gas</strong>ifiers. New testing<br />

protocols are being developed to suit micro-<strong>gas</strong>ifiers.<br />

There is no single answer to the numerous needs of the world. Some stoves can do one<br />

task really well but are not suitable for other tasks. The solution is in a variety of custommade<br />

or purpose-designed applications. This variety of designs is imperative and there<br />

is no ‗superior‘ or ‗best‘ design. There is no ‗one-size-fits-all‘ design, but always a ‗onesize-fits-some‘.<br />

Some designs are more appropriate in certain scenarios than others.<br />

Therefore we need to know the uses of the different designs and how to make choices<br />

in each set of conditions.<br />

Some features are valued differently by different users: batch-feeding of a stove is seen<br />

by some as a big advantage, as they don‘t need to tend to the fire every 2-5 minutes.<br />

Others consider this a disadvantage, as the entire container needs to be exchanged and<br />

reloaded at the end of the burn.<br />

Some micro-<strong>gas</strong>ifiers have been optimized for specific fuels, making them excellent in<br />

some situations but inappropriate in other places.<br />

<strong>Micro</strong>-<strong>gas</strong>ifiers are not always an appropriate solution for a household stove, depending<br />

on fuel access. It does not make much sense to chop up big chunks of wood <strong>with</strong> a machete<br />

or an axe, so that the fuel becomes small enough for the use in a micro-<strong>gas</strong>ifier.<br />

Where access to stick-shaped wood is still reasonable, appropriate stoves for this fueltype<br />

should be encouraged. <strong>Micro</strong>-<strong>gas</strong>ifiers should never been seen as a threat to existing<br />

systems, but always as a complementing element, as they offer the opportunity to<br />

use available and often discarded <strong>biomass</strong> as a fuel, that other stoves cannot burn<br />

cleanly. There is more information on fuel and fuel preparation in Chapter 3.<br />

Some developers (Belonio, Reddy, Karve, Anderson, Donnelly, and others) offer many<br />

more designs and models than shown here. Those designs might be important in niche<br />

situations. Links are provided for further reading.<br />

There are also different concepts of producing stoves, ranging <strong>from</strong> entirely local production<br />

based on scrap or new materials, to partially pre-manufactured and locally assembled production<br />

or entirely ‗foreign‘ manufactured imported technologies. Each concept has its own<br />

advantages and disadvantages. On a case-by-case basis, the situation needs to be evaluated<br />

for the most feasible option. Sometimes a sequential approach is more effective, starting<br />

<strong>with</strong> one type to lead to another in the long run.<br />

HERA – GIZ Manual <strong>Micro</strong>-<strong><strong>gas</strong>ification</strong> Version 1.01 January 2011<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!