Micro-gasification: Cooking with gas from biomass - Amper
Micro-gasification: Cooking with gas from biomass - Amper
Micro-gasification: Cooking with gas from biomass - Amper
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Micro</strong>-<strong><strong>gas</strong>ification</strong>: <strong>Cooking</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>gas</strong> <strong>from</strong> dry <strong>biomass</strong><br />
The moist-dry ambient temperature, low-medium pressure (10-50 bar) process: The<br />
next level would usually start at similar the pressure as the previous process, but go far<br />
beyond, depending on the type of machinery. It uses some form of binder (clay, starch, banana<br />
peel paste, waxes, glues, molasses, etc.). Temperatures are still near ambient but the<br />
water is minimal or absent. The relatively dry feedstock mix allows the use of loose augurs<br />
(‗screws‘) and rams or pillow compression cylinders, as well as the above "wet process"<br />
presses. Over 10 designs of hand driven or mechanized presses using various augurs and<br />
rams are in use. Costs can start at 50 USD for hand-driven devices. Fuel density ranges<br />
<strong>from</strong> .3 to .7 gm/cc. The product range includes waxed logs and products <strong>from</strong> char dust<br />
products, finding increased acceptance in the third world.<br />
Dry high-pressure process: The next kind of densification involves a great jump in pressure<br />
(400 to 600 bars), and requires drying equipment to assure a moisture content below 20%.<br />
Compression by ram or augur often requires added heating jackets which raise the barrel/cylinder/die<br />
temperatures up to around 200° Celsius. This combination of pressure and<br />
temperature effectively scorches the exterior wall of the resulting log, and tends to melt the<br />
lignin of the <strong>biomass</strong> to accomplish binding. The process requires an assured supply of<br />
feedstock of a known type, grade and moisture content. These are more industrialized machines<br />
costing between 3,000 and 30,000 USD.<br />
The term ‗briquette‘ is used for a sizeable ‗chunk‘ of densified product of any shape and<br />
compaction level where the smallest side-length is above 2 cm size.<br />
If the final product of a high-pressure compaction is a short roundish stick of 6-12 mm diameter,<br />
the term ‗pellet‘ is used. Pellets are shaped by pressing dry <strong>biomass</strong> at very high<br />
pressure through a die <strong>with</strong> many holes (like an oversize spaghetti-maker).<br />
Various briquette- and pellet- presses are available mostly for the industrialized world. Fuel<br />
densities can even go beyond 1.0 gm/cc, as some highly densified briquettes and pellets<br />
are heavier than water and don‘t float (an easy test to determine fuel density). There is a<br />
risk that dense but super dry pellets and briquettes tend to crumble apart in more humid<br />
conditions, as they regain moisture. In general the product quality increases <strong>with</strong> rising<br />
compaction pressure, which entails:<br />
Higher temperatures: causing the lignin contained in the feedstock itself to ‗melt‘, so it<br />
can act like wax as the sole binder. Added binders become unnecessary.<br />
Less water needed for the feedstock preparation: thus less drying time and space<br />
needed afterwards; lower moisture content of product, thus higher heating values<br />
Rising electricity requirements and higher costs for investment and operation<br />
Decreasing labour intensity which reduces job creation in the production phase, <strong>with</strong> the<br />
potential of more local job creation in the fuel distribution chain<br />
Many factors influence the feasibility of <strong>biomass</strong> densification in a given scenario.<br />
The following tables attempts to give guidance for the choice of densification options according<br />
to the desired pressure and intended throughput per hour. It reflects methods of<br />
feedstock preparation and compaction, binders, etc.<br />
The availability of required inputs like water, electricity, capital, labour, space etc. is critical<br />
to the success of any densification project. These can potentially be limiting factors for the<br />
feasibility of a densification option and should be used initially as part of the ‗make-or-break‘<br />
arguments. Please note that the factors described are in a continuum and have no clearly<br />
defined concrete values that would determine a clear-cut boundary to the next category.<br />
Examples for some technologies are shown in continuation after the table.<br />
HERA – GIZ Manual <strong>Micro</strong>-<strong><strong>gas</strong>ification</strong> Version 1.01 January 2011<br />
82