Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2013 - European Commission - Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

106 O P E N I N N O V A T I O N 2 0 1 3 Figure 3: FI-WARE Testbed: overall topology [2] Where are we now? Next steps This article describes an ecosystem that will offer innovation-enabling capabilities to any stakeholder interested in gaining the maximum advantage of Future Internet technologies. The business environment has dramatically changed, driven by the possibilities of a new ICT landscape. Those who are not able to adapt to such context will suffer the consequences to the point that they may not even be able to compete in the market anymore. This has already happened to many companies. This has already affected many industrial sectors. It is, therefore, a need and not an option. FI PPP and FI-WARE specifically offer Europe a great opportunity to invest in long-term added-value assets that will allow Europe to gain competitiveness again and make an impact on our economy. It is not an easy endeavour though, and will require the following, among other things. • Leadership and commitment, accompanied by technical excellence. • Definition of the right incentives to promote the usage of results before they become fully operational. This may entail supporting measures such as the incentives governments are putting in place to foster open data or precommercial procurement to enable faster adoption of cloud computing. These two examples could inspire actions in this domain. • Convincing messages on benefits for all the involved stakeholders including, and in particular, SMEs. This initiative is justified if it reaches critical mass. Therefore, it is required that this community pays careful attention to the multiplying effect that capabilities to generate Open Innovation could have on third parties. As many experts declare [6] and experience shows: the more open the scenario is, the more innovation and growth we will achieve.
References [1] http://www.fi-ppp.eu/ [2] http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/ index.php/Main_Page [3] European Commission former Directorate-General for the Information Society and Media, Unit F4 New Infrastructure Paradigms and Experimental Facilities (2009), Living Labs for user-driven open innovation — An overview of the Living Labs methodology, activities and achievements. [4] http://livinglabs.mit.edu/ [5] ISTAG EAR working group report, Involving users in the development of Ambient Intelligence (http://www. cordis.lu/ist/istag.htm). [6] IBM Global Business Services (April 2010), Telco 2015 — Five telling years, four future scenarios, IBM, NY. Contact Nuria de Lama Atos Representative to the European Commission, Atos Research and Innovation Nuria.delama@atosresearch.eu Former editions of the Service Innovation yearbooks and Open Innovation 2012 are available online (http://www.openinnovation-platform.eu). 107
Page 1 and 2:
doi 10.2759/87245 KK-AI-12-001-EN-C
Page 3 and 4:
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Open Innovation
Page 5 and 6:
Contents FOREWORD . . . . . . . . .
Page 7 and 8:
Introduction The objective of our I
Page 9 and 10:
Executive summary This yearbook Ope
Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER I Policy development 1.1. E
Page 13 and 14:
shift the development pace signific
Page 15 and 16:
In the approach the European Commis
Page 17 and 18:
Innovation dynamics have increased,
Page 19 and 20:
and joint growth in an organic, non
Page 21 and 22:
their environment with its technolo
Page 23 and 24:
In the course of his work, McInerne
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 3: Ecological systems framew
Page 27 and 28:
innovation maturity level such as t
Page 29 and 30:
[13] Oakley, A. (1990), Schumpeter
Page 31 and 32:
Innovation does not necessarily imp
Page 33 and 34:
where Europe remains an abstraction
Page 35 and 36:
[4] Giannakouris, K., Smihily, M. (
Page 37 and 38:
The term ‘smart city’ has attra
Page 39 and 40:
Improve-My-City is an application d
Page 41 and 42:
participate, and a proof of this is
Page 43 and 44:
models could dynamically evolve ove
Page 45 and 46:
even learn to pilot, experiment and
Page 47 and 48:
European ICT companies are collabor
Page 49 and 50:
‘smart specialisation platform’
Page 51 and 52:
2.3. Innovating with and for the pu
Page 53 and 54:
Case study: Helsinki City Home Care
Page 55 and 56:
Thus, the city has acted as a co-cr
Page 57 and 58: Neelie Kroes, Vice-President of the
Page 59 and 60: There are many European initiatives
Page 61 and 62: 3.2. Participative innovation in sm
Page 63 and 64: LIGHT HOUSE Figure 2: The reference
Page 65 and 66: who’s allowed to do what? Who is
Page 67 and 68: Figure 6: Elements of the roadmap f
Page 69 and 70: The roadmap shows that much is alre
Page 71 and 72: Concrete actions for the short term
Page 73 and 74: 3.3. Smarter water: why open innova
Page 75 and 76: industrial users’ infrastructure
Page 77 and 78: [27] UN Office for the Coordination
Page 79 and 80: There is, however, a general agreem
Page 81 and 82: to more personalisation on data-sha
Page 83 and 84: [14] The official website of the UK
Page 85 and 86: the organisation to meet demand in
Page 87 and 88: Table 2: Challenges of the company
Page 89 and 90: 3.6. Horizon 2020: Regional Innovat
Page 91 and 92: The thrust of the recommendations f
Page 93 and 94: Table 2: Possible 1-year work proce
Page 95 and 96: programme (Figure 1). Participants
Page 97 and 98: The active agents of the metropolis
Page 99 and 100: • active cross-sectoral communica
Page 101 and 102: Working with patterns is not a new
Page 103 and 104: shifts in deep understanding that a
Page 105 and 106: We are now approaching the end of t
Page 107: The Open Innovation Lab: innovation
show all

Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2013 - European Commission - Europa

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?