Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2013 - European Commission - Europa
Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2013 - European Commission - Europa
Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2013 - European Commission - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Innovation</strong> dynamics have increased, also leading<br />
to new requirements for successful and sustainable<br />
innovation ecosystems (Figure 6). Experimenting<br />
and prototyping better enable trials of entirely new<br />
and risky solutions and also call for a new type of<br />
daring leadership.<br />
Thus, the characteristics of sustainable innovation<br />
are the following.<br />
• It is full of disruptions!<br />
• It is about (value) choices!<br />
• It is beyond (political) buzzwords!<br />
• It is holistic!<br />
All this means increased risk-taking (in a managed<br />
way) but, at the same time, greater gains for successful<br />
and, often daring, new solutions. Does the<br />
approach in Horizon 2020 allow modern innovation?<br />
My answer is definitely ‘Yes’, but it requires courage<br />
to take the new approach in practice.<br />
New instruments<br />
As I write this article, new instruments which support<br />
faster innovation cycles, with higher return<br />
rates, are being developed at the Directorate-<br />
General for Communications Networks, Content and<br />
Technology.<br />
The new approach to support innovation in a more<br />
holistic manner can, for example, be seen in<br />
the tools developed for the new Horizon 2020<br />
framework.<br />
Firstly, as mentioned earlier, the whole Horizon<br />
2020 programme structure supports demandorientation<br />
that links interdisciplinary thinking to<br />
problem-solving. The science-driven innovation part<br />
of the programme supports the growth of new science<br />
and technology-based results to be harvested<br />
in the other parts of the programme.<br />
The new tools currently in discussion are, for example,<br />
the extension of the piloting approach currently<br />
in the seventh framework programme. The pilots<br />
were used, for example, in the IST PSP programme<br />
to verify, in large-scale pilots, the platform thinking<br />
in cross-border applications. These pilots were<br />
driven by public sector organisations. Examples of<br />
these can be found in eHealth, eGovernment and<br />
eProcurement.<br />
In the new approach, piloting is extended beyond<br />
the downstreaming, to prototyping, testing and<br />
demonstrations in real-world settings. This, as discussed<br />
earlier, enables faster identification of the<br />
potentially successful approaches but, likewise,<br />
helps to fail fast, avoiding costly failures at a too<br />
late stage. The pilot/experimentation approach<br />
en ables seamless integration of demand-side innovation<br />
with a technology-enabled approach. Users<br />
will be also in important role in this approach —<br />
ideally, involved in all stages of the projects.<br />
Pre-commercial procurement and public procurement<br />
of innovation will be reshaped and extended<br />
to, ideally, provide the necessary bridge from<br />
prototypes and experiments to scale-up. Public sector<br />
procurers have tremendous purchasing power,<br />
meaning that their impact on take-up of modern<br />
solutions can be of crucial importance.<br />
Importantly, inducement prizes will also be proposed.<br />
They drive real solutions which are often<br />
application-oriented. Prizes attract new constituencies<br />
who are not usually involved in EU projects.<br />
Prizes also publicly highlight well the issues to be<br />
solved. Current thinking is based on three categories<br />
of prizes, namely: grand prizes (up to EUR 10<br />
million); major prizes (up to EUR 6 million); and<br />
sectorial prizes (up to EUR 1 million). Prizes ideally<br />
bridge research results to commercialisation without<br />
predetermining the structure or technology of<br />
the solution.<br />
From the open innovation perspective, perhaps<br />
(besides prizes) the most interesting scheme is the<br />
non-descriptive, open, light and fast scheme which<br />
supports disruptive innovation. This approach does<br />
not predetermine the topic area, but proposes<br />
a cross-sectorial approach and leads to high rewards<br />
and high impacts. The risk level of this initiative is<br />
rather high, but by dividing the process into phases,<br />
the risk is managed. At the same time, it maintains<br />
the openness and incentive in the scheme.<br />
One of the targets of this scheme is to create new<br />
markets through the disruptive approach, which<br />
very often also involves the strong presence of the<br />
problem owner (clientele, citizens) in the project<br />
execution. At its best, it enables co-creativity in<br />
innovative solutions.<br />
The scheme is divided into three phases: the first<br />
is a feasibility study and demonstration, funded up<br />
to some EUR 50 000. After this period, the most<br />
promising 20 % can continue for 6–9 months to<br />
the next phase, which consists of validation and<br />
trialling the solution in real-world settings. Funding<br />
for this experimentation phase would be up to<br />
some EUR 2 million for a maximum of 18 months.<br />
At the end of the second phase, prizes could also<br />
be granted for the most successful based on the<br />
impact and scalability of the solution.<br />
15