25.08.2013 Views

manufacture, processing and use of stainless steel - International ...

manufacture, processing and use of stainless steel - International ...

manufacture, processing and use of stainless steel - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

testing. The former study was poorly conducted <strong>and</strong> contributes no reliable data. The<br />

latter study, although deficient in several respects, provides no evidence for the<br />

carcinogenicity <strong>of</strong> the MMA/SS welding fume tested.<br />

Human data<br />

Milatou-Smith et al. 1997<br />

Mortality in two cohorts <strong>of</strong> welders was investigated by Milatou-Smith et al. (1997).<br />

This paper includes the follow-up <strong>of</strong> an earlier study by Sjögren et al. (1987). One<br />

cohort comprised 233 males with at least five years experience <strong>of</strong> welding <strong>stainless</strong><br />

<strong>steel</strong> during the period 1950-1965. Most <strong>of</strong> the subjects had welded using coated<br />

electrodes (i.e. MMA welding); a small number had <strong>use</strong>d the TIG method. The<br />

second cohort comprised 208 railway track welders, with at least five years<br />

experience during the same period. Both cohorts were followed through to 1992. The<br />

first cohort was reported as having high exposure to Cr VI relative to the second cohort.<br />

The only exposure data presented were from a national survey <strong>of</strong> welders in 1975;<br />

median TWA “chromium” levels for MMA welding were reported to be 110 µg/m 3 ,<br />

with maximum levels <strong>of</strong> 750 µg/m 3 . It is assumed that these values refer to total<br />

chromium, although this is not stated. There were no exposure data which<br />

specifically related to subjects in this study. Expected numbers <strong>of</strong> deaths were based<br />

on national mortality rates, adjusted for age, sex <strong>and</strong> calendar period.<br />

In the “high exposure” cohort, overall mortality was less than expected (Observed 60,<br />

Expected 76.1, SMR 79, 95% CI 60 to 102). There were six lung cancer deaths in<br />

this cohort (Expected 3.65, SMR 164, 95% CI 60 to 358). In the “low exposure”<br />

cohort, both overall mortality <strong>and</strong> lung cancer mortality were below the expected<br />

incidence. There were 80 deaths (all ca<strong>use</strong>s) in this cohort compared to 110 expected<br />

(SMR 73, 95% CI 58 to 91), <strong>and</strong> two lung cancer deaths (Expected 4.88, SMR 41,<br />

95% CI 5 to 148). With both cohorts, exposure to asbestos may have occurred,<br />

although the study authors assume that exposure to asbestos was “very low”.<br />

This study indicated a non-significant excess <strong>of</strong> lung cancer among MMA/SS<br />

welders, although the cohort size was small. An association between these lung<br />

cancers <strong>and</strong> exposure to welding fume remains uncertain. Further, possible<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> asbestos cannot be excluded.<br />

Becker et al. 1991<br />

A cohort mortality study was conducted among 1221 arc welders exposed to fumes<br />

containing nickel <strong>and</strong> chromium <strong>and</strong> an internal reference group <strong>of</strong> 1694 turners<br />

(Becker et al. 1991). All workers were employed at one <strong>of</strong> 25 factories from the<br />

German metal <strong>processing</strong> industry; it is not clear whether all 25 factories were<br />

<strong>processing</strong> <strong>stainless</strong> <strong>steel</strong>s. All study subjects had worked as either welders or turners<br />

for at least six months in the period 1950-70. The period <strong>of</strong> observation is not clearly<br />

stated; it would seem to be 1950-88, although the title <strong>of</strong> the paper which includes the<br />

phrase "results <strong>of</strong> a second follow up 1983-8" could leave a different impression.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!