The timeline for milestone 1 includes an elongated system integration time of 6 months instead of 3 months. After the completion of milestone 3 and before milestone 4 a calibration experiment using fast neutrons will be required. 94
13. Organization and Distribution of Responsibilities The detector design was developed from a subgroup of the R 3 B collaboration, called the <strong>NeuLAND</strong> Working Group. The members, as of today, are listed in appendix A. The <strong>NeuLAND</strong> Working Group, convened currently by Konstanze Boretzky, GSI, and her deputy, Ushasi Datta Pramanik, SINP, will build the <strong>NeuLAND</strong> detector. A close contact to the R 3 B Technical Coordinator and the Project Coordinator enables a smooth embedding of the <strong>NeuLAND</strong> detector into the R 3 B’s full setup. The responsibilities for the different subtasks are closely related to their associated funding profile, as laid out in chapter 11. In table 13, we summarize the required tasks for the construction phase of <strong>NeuLAND</strong> and assign the institutes with key responsibilities. More details on the tasks are found in the numerated list below. Item <strong>NeuLAND</strong> Task Short Description Responsible Institutes 1 Submodules purchase, assembly, test SINP, TU Darmstadt, & double planes PNPI, TU Dresden, HZDR, U Cologne, U Frankfurt, GSI 2 Sample Tests using electron beams HZDR 3 Mechanics detector & double-plane frames GSI full integration 4 Electronics quality control, integration GSI 5 HV System production, quality control, integration PNPI, GSI Table 13.1.: Layout of the subtasks for the building phase of <strong>NeuLAND</strong> and the responsibity distribution. The item numbers refer to the list in the text, accordingly. 1. <strong>NeuLAND</strong> Submodules and Double-Planes This task comprises first, the purchase of scintillator bars, photomultipliers and needed peripherals like voltage supplies and read-out channels, second, the assembly of <strong>NeuLAND</strong> submodules and its acceptance tests, third, the arrangement of <strong>NeuLAND</strong> submodules into double-planes. The work load is shared amongst the partners according to the financial contributions. Since, for practical reasons, the <strong>NeuLAND</strong> submodules will be built on-site at GSI/<strong>FAIR</strong>, the external partners will send personnel to GSI/<strong>FAIR</strong> for the assembly and testing procedure. 95
- Page 1 and 2:
FAIR/NUSTAR/R 3 B/TDR NeuLAND Techn
- Page 3 and 4:
Germany EMMI and FIAS: Enrico Fiori
- Page 5 and 6:
INR Moscow: Alexander Botvina Russi
- Page 7 and 8:
Contents Executive Summary 11 1. In
- Page 9:
B.7. MRPC Solution using Glass as C
- Page 12 and 13:
Apart from the excellent energy res
- Page 14 and 15:
processes in the universe, such as
- Page 16 and 17:
decaying into 24 O plus 4 neutrons
- Page 19 and 20:
2. Physics Scenarios: Requirements
- Page 21 and 22:
e studied at R 3 B at FAIR include
- Page 23 and 24:
all theoretical calculations predic
- Page 25 and 26:
at the surface of the nucleus. The
- Page 27 and 28:
the evolution of fission channels (
- Page 29 and 30:
3. Summary of NeuLAND Prototype Res
- Page 31 and 32:
counts 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 15 15
- Page 33 and 34:
Figure 3.4.: Shown is the time reso
- Page 35 and 36:
4. Monte Carlo Simulations Within t
- Page 37 and 38:
normalized counts normalized counts
- Page 39 and 40:
GEANT3 interface. Here, we compare
- Page 41 and 42:
Counts 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400
- Page 43 and 44: counts 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 LAND
- Page 45 and 46: incident neutron fully active detec
- Page 47 and 48: investigated. Three values for the
- Page 49 and 50: spectrum, absorption length, refrac
- Page 51 and 52: Counts 600 500 400 300 200 100 with
- Page 53 and 54: Since, as discussed above, several
- Page 55 and 56: events 800 600 400 200 0 0 200 400
- Page 57 and 58: clusters N 100 50 0 0 500 1000 1500
- Page 59 and 60: In the following section we discuss
- Page 61 and 62: events 15000 10000 5000 input outpu
- Page 63 and 64: events 2000 1500 1000 500 σ = 15 k
- Page 65 and 66: 5. Technical Specifications and Des
- Page 67 and 68: construction, or for subsequent rep
- Page 69 and 70: positioning of 50 submodules mounti
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 5.6.: Detector frame with fi
- Page 73 and 74: 5.4. Peripheral Systems 5.4.1. Read
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 5.12.: The photo shows the T
- Page 77: 6. Radiation Environment and Safety
- Page 81 and 82: 8. Calibration 8.1. Calibration wit
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 8.3.: ToF distribution in 10
- Page 85: Figure 8.4.: Event display for seve
- Page 89 and 90: 10. Installation procedure, its Tim
- Page 91: 11. Cost and Funding 11.1. Cost Est
- Page 96 and 97: 96 2. Sample Tests Random samples o
- Page 98 and 99: PNPI St. Petersburg: G.D. Alkhazov,
- Page 100 and 101: HV 1.$ mm 2$ mm 0+$1-2)-2'.%/ 5%4'.
- Page 102 and 103: Beamline Be exit window P 6 P 3 P 4
- Page 104 and 105: B.3. Design Issues Addressed with 4
- Page 106 and 107: Time [ns] Counts 41 40 39 2200 2000
- Page 108 and 109: Efficiency 100 80 60 40 20 0 7.5 8
- Page 110 and 111: 200 AMeV, Erel = 100 keV emitted %
- Page 112 and 113: B.7. MRPC Solution using Glass as C
- Page 114 and 115: 114
- Page 116 and 117: [Bot-04] S. Botvina andI.N. Mishust
- Page 118 and 119: [Lip-03] C. Lippmann, PhD Thesis, U