Lee A. Bygrave (red.) YULEX 2002 - Universitetet i Oslo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

............................................................................ 54 Susan Schiavetta Moreover, the GATE approach does not really solve the underlying problems associated with classification and may only serve to disrupt other preestablished regimes. In a similar vein, both GATT and TRIPS also generate a number of dilemmas. Consequently, for the sake of uniformity, simplicity and e-commerce developmental purposes, it is recommended that e-products be classified as services.
WHAT SHOULD ACCESS LEGISLATION BE LIKE IN THE FUTURE? – POSSIBLE STRUCTURES FOR ACCESS LEGISLATION DAG WIESE SCHARTUM 1 Introduction and approach The Internet is creating new possibilities and capabilities to introduce “open government” and improved access to government-held information. In this article, I discuss the information held by government – ie, information either produced or received by a public organ. 1 In particular, I discuss the development of national legislation in connection with such information. First, I comment on the considerations which could be viewed as the very backbone of legislation that gives access to government-held information (section 2). I then explain some of the basic structures and properties of contemporary Norwegian access legislation, assuming that most of these characteristics are relevant in the majority of European jurisdictions (section 3). Thereafter, in section 4, I draw attention to what I believe represents a clear shift in factual information access policy which is the result of creative use of Internet technology. In section 5, I combine elements from the previous sections in an attempt to propose possible structures and elements for a future, amended, access legislation. By so doing, I question the fruitfulness of pursuing the traditional approach. This article mainly contains a legal-political approach to the discussion of “open government”. It is both “legal” and “political” in the sense that the discussions relating to prefer<strong>red</strong> political solutions are founded on basic legal arguments, supporting open government and access rights. Further, it is partly based on a categorisation and discussion of existing legislation within the field. The article is not political in a general sense, since non-legal arguments in favour of a certain understanding or solution are not part of my arguments. In my view, lawyers are needed in order to develop new concepts 1 This could be seen as different to “public sector information”, which can be used to designate (the narrower) information concerning the public (government) sector.
Page 1 and 2:
...................................
Page 3: FORORD Denne boken er den andre i Y
Page 7 and 8: SELVREGULERING OLAV TORVUND Selvreg
Page 9 and 10: ...................................
Page 11 and 12: ...................................
Page 13 and 14: ...................................
Page 15 and 16: DETERMINING APPLICABLE LAW AND JURI
Page 17 and 18: ...................................
Page 19 and 20: ...................................
Page 21 and 22: ...................................
Page 23 and 24: ...................................
Page 25 and 26: ...................................
Page 27: ...................................
Page 30 and 31: ...................................
Page 32 and 33: ...................................
Page 34 and 35: ...................................
Page 36 and 37: ...................................
Page 38 and 39: ...................................
Page 40 and 41: ...................................
Page 42 and 43: ...................................
Page 44 and 45: ...................................
Page 46 and 47: ...................................
Page 48 and 49: ...................................
Page 50 and 51: ...................................
Page 52 and 53: ...................................
Page 56 and 57: ...................................
Page 58 and 59: ...................................
Page 60 and 61: ...................................
Page 62 and 63: ...................................
Page 64 and 65: ...................................
Page 66 and 67: ...................................
Page 68 and 69: ...................................
Page 70 and 71: ...................................
Page 72 and 73: ...................................
Page 74 and 75: ...................................
Page 76 and 77: ...................................
Page 78 and 79: ...................................
Page 80 and 81: ...................................
Page 82 and 83: ...................................
Page 84 and 85: ...................................
Page 86 and 87: ...................................
Page 88 and 89: ...................................
Page 91 and 92: THE SCHENGEN INFORMATION SYSTEM IN
Page 93 and 94: ...................................
Page 95 and 96: ...................................
Page 97 and 98: ...................................
Page 99 and 100: ...................................
Page 101 and 102: ...................................
Page 103 and 104: ...................................
Page 105 and 106:
...................................
Page 107 and 108:
...................................
Page 109 and 110:
...................................
Page 111 and 112:
...................................
Page 113:
...................................
Page 116 and 117:
...................................
Page 119 and 120:
FORFATTEROPPLYSNINGER Jens Petter B
Page 121 and 122:
NOTES ON AUTHORS Jens Petter Berg (
show all

Lee A. Bygrave (red.) YULEX 2002 - Universitetet i Oslo

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?