Transmission Expansion Planning in Deregulated Power ... - tuprints
Transmission Expansion Planning in Deregulated Power ... - tuprints
Transmission Expansion Planning in Deregulated Power ... - tuprints
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2 <strong>Transmission</strong> <strong>Expansion</strong> <strong>Plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Approaches 10<br />
• Selection of the optimal alternative<br />
• Prioritization of the decision alternatives by rank<strong>in</strong>g fuzzy appropriateness <strong>in</strong>dices<br />
• Selection of the decision alternative with highest priority as the optimal alternative<br />
2.1.2 <strong>Transmission</strong> <strong>Expansion</strong> <strong>Plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Approaches for <strong>Deregulated</strong> <strong>Power</strong> Systems<br />
From the viewpo<strong>in</strong>t of transmission planner, there are two major differences between<br />
transmission expansion plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> regulated and deregulated environments:<br />
• Objectives of transmission expansion plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> deregulated power systems differ<br />
from those of the regulated ones.<br />
• Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> deregulated power systems are much more than <strong>in</strong> regulated ones.<br />
In this section objectives of transmission expansion plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> deregulated power systems<br />
and uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> deregulated power systems are discussed.<br />
2.1.2.1 Objectives of <strong>Transmission</strong> <strong>Expansion</strong> <strong>Plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Deregulated</strong> <strong>Power</strong> Systems<br />
In general, the ma<strong>in</strong> objective of transmission expansion plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> deregulated power<br />
systems is to provide a non-discrim<strong>in</strong>atory competitive environment for all stakeholders,<br />
while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g power system reliability. Specifically, the objective of transmission<br />
expansion plann<strong>in</strong>g is provid<strong>in</strong>g for the desires of stakeholders. The desires of stakeholders <strong>in</strong><br />
transmission expansion are:<br />
• encourag<strong>in</strong>g and facilitat<strong>in</strong>g competition among electric market participants [18], [22],<br />
[28]-[32],<br />
• provid<strong>in</strong>g non-discrim<strong>in</strong>atory access to cheap generation for all consumers [18], [22],<br />
[30], [33], [35],<br />
• m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the risk of <strong>in</strong>vestments aga<strong>in</strong>st all uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties [15]-[21], [24], [28], [36]-[40],<br />
• m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the costs of <strong>in</strong>vestment and operation [2], [20]-[21],<br />
• <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the reliability of the network [2], [37]-[38], [41]-[46],<br />
• <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the flexibility of system operation [2],<br />
• reduc<strong>in</strong>g network charges [2],<br />
• m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the environmental impacts [2], [18], and<br />
• <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the value of the system [12], [17], [36], [41]-[46].<br />
The above objectives have different degrees of importance from the viewpo<strong>in</strong>t of different<br />
stakeholders. On the other hand, stakeholders have different weights of importance <strong>in</strong>