07.10.2013 Views

Transmission Expansion Planning in Deregulated Power ... - tuprints

Transmission Expansion Planning in Deregulated Power ... - tuprints

Transmission Expansion Planning in Deregulated Power ... - tuprints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 Probabilistic locational Marg<strong>in</strong>al Prices 28<br />

LMP of bus No. 1 <strong>in</strong> $/MWhr<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000<br />

Monte Carlo iteration<br />

1500 2000<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000<br />

Monte Carlo iteration<br />

1500 2000<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Fig. 3.5- LMPs of buses 1 and 2 <strong>in</strong> different iteration of Monte Carlo simulation<br />

congestion, <strong>in</strong>put power of the tie-l<strong>in</strong>e TL2 which behaves as a zero bid generator prevents<br />

from dispatch<strong>in</strong>g cheap generation near bus 2. This is why the LMP of bus 2 is zero <strong>in</strong> some<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts (see figures 3.4.(b) and 3.5.(b)). If there is transmission congestion between<br />

buses 2 and 4, the output power of tie-l<strong>in</strong>e TL4 is provided by the generators which are<br />

located near bus 4. These generators have high bids. Therefore, this wheel<strong>in</strong>g transaction<br />

causes expensive generation dispatch <strong>in</strong>stead of cheap generation. This example shows that<br />

wheel<strong>in</strong>g transactions affect the LMPs of control areas that transmit through them.<br />

In above example the wheel<strong>in</strong>g power is <strong>in</strong> the direction of network congestion and <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

the <strong>in</strong>tensity of congestion. Now suppose the direction of wheel<strong>in</strong>g changes. Figure 3.6 shows<br />

mean of generation power, mean of load, mean of power of l<strong>in</strong>es, and mean of LMPs for<br />

wheel<strong>in</strong>g from bus 4 to bus 2. Comparison of figure 3.6 and 3.3 shows if direction of<br />

wheel<strong>in</strong>g power changes, the wheel<strong>in</strong>g power decrease the congestion and release<br />

transmission capacity. PDFs of power of l<strong>in</strong>es 2 and 6 are shown <strong>in</strong> figure 3.7. Compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

figures 3.7.a and 3.7.b shows that if direction of wheel<strong>in</strong>g power changes, the probability of<br />

congest<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e 2 decreases from 0.875 to 0.194. The probability of congest<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e 6<br />

decreases from 0.128 to 0.091. This means we can postpone transmission expansion by<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g wheel<strong>in</strong>g transactions <strong>in</strong> proper direction. In some cases it may be beneficial to buy<br />

expensive power from some control areas and sell it to other control areas <strong>in</strong> cheaper price to<br />

release transmission capacity and postpone transmission expansion. In general a wheel<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transaction may congest some l<strong>in</strong>es and release the capacity of some other transmission l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

LMP of bus No. 2 <strong>in</strong> $/MWhr<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!