Transmission Expansion Planning in Deregulated Power ... - tuprints

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5 Market Based Transmission Expansion Planning 68 average load payment ($/hr) 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 0 1 2 3 4 planning stage 5 6 7 8 Fig. 5.9 (a) - Values of ALP at different stages of planning (In each stage there are six bars. These bars show the values of ALP when SML, WGD, WG, WD, ACC, or ALP is used as planning criterion respectively.) average load payment ($/hr) 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 planning criterion: SML planning criterion: WG planning criterion: WD planning criterion: WGD planning criterion: CC planning criterion: LP 0 0 1 2 3 4 planning stage 5 6 7 8 Fig. 5.9 (b) - Values of ALP at different stages of planning when SML, WGD, WG, WD, ACC, or ALP is used as planning criterion. SML WG WD WGD CC LP
5 Market Based Transmission Expansion Planning 69 5.3.2 Case 2: There Is Non-random Uncertainty In this case it is assumed that the following non-random uncertainties have been identified by planners: • A generator may be added at bus 10 of the network. • An IPP may be added at bus 16 of the network. • Load of bus 24 may be change. Characteristics new generator, IPP, and load are given in tables 5.11 and 5.12. To take into account these non-random uncertainties in transmission expansion planning, the following scenarios are defined: • Scenario 1: base case (scenario which is shown in tables 5.3 and 5.4) • Scenario 2: base case plus the new generator • Scenario 3: base case plus the load change • Scenario 4: base case plus the IPP • Scenario 5: base case plus the new generator and load change • Scenario 6: base case plus the new generator and IPP • Scenario 7: base case plus the load change and IPP • Scenario 8: base case plus the new generator, load change, and IPP It is assumed that all above scenarios have the same occurrence degree. SML, WGD, and ACC are used as planning criterion. In other word, SML, WGD, and ACC are used as cost function of risk analysis. Table 5.13 shows the result of planning under SML criterion. In this table rows 1-4 show SV, number of candidates (NC), minimax regret plan (MRP), and capacity of minimax regret plan (CMP) at different stages of planning. Rows 5-12 show the values of SML at different scenarios and different stages of planning when SML is used as planning criterion. Rows 13- 20 show the values of WGD at different scenarios and different stages of planning when SML Table 5.11 – Characteristics of uncertain new generator and IPP Type Bus No. Min Power (MW) Max Power (MW) PDF of Bid ($/MWhr) Unavailability Gen. 10 0 150 N~(11, 1.2) 0.02 IPP 16 0 N~(80, 20) N~(13, 1.5) 0.02 Table 5.12 - Characteristics of uncertain new load Bus No. Min Power (MW) PDF of Load (MW) Bid ($/MWhr) Unavailability 24 0 N~ (50, 10) 17 0.05
Page 1 and 2:
Transmission Expansion Planning in
Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgements This work was star
Page 5 and 6:
Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Resea
Page 7:
Contents III 8.2.1 Fuzzy Regret and
Page 10 and 11:
1 Introduction 2 benefits. Consumer
Page 12 and 13:
2 Transmission Expansion Planning A
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
3 Probabilistic locational Marginal
Page 26 and 27: 3 Probabilistic locational Marginal
Page 39 and 40: 4 Market Based Criteria The main ob
Page 41 and 42: 4 Market Based Criteria 33 cc i wit
Page 43 and 44: 4 Market Based Criteria 35 In the r
Page 45 and 46: 4 Market Based Criteria 37 Fig. 4.4
Page 47 and 48: 4 Market Based Criteria 39 k 1 k µ
Page 49 and 50: 4 Market Based Criteria 41 with: k
Page 51 and 52: 4 Market Based Criteria 43 k ANOC a
Page 53 and 54: 4 Market Based Criteria 45 28.8 235
Page 55: 4 Market Based Criteria 47 σ σ σ
Page 58 and 59: 5 Market Based Transmission Expansi
Page 89 and 90: 6 Fuzzy Risk Assessment In chapter
Page 91 and 92: 6 Fuzzy Risk Assessment 83 other sc
Page 93 and 94: 6 Fuzzy Risk Assessment 85 6.4.1 Fu
Page 95 and 96: 6 Fuzzy Risk Assessment 87 appropri
Page 97 and 98: 6 Fuzzy Risk Assessment 89 plan 5-2
Page 99 and 100: 7 Stakeholders’ Desires Restructu
Page 101 and 102: 7 Stakeholders’ Desires 93 Flexib
Page 103 and 104: 7 Stakeholders’ Desires 95 Table
Page 105 and 106: 7 Stakeholders’ Desires 97 7.5 Ca
Page 107: 7 Stakeholders’ Desires 99 63 11
Page 110 and 111: 8 Transmission Expansion Planning U
Page 117 and 118: 9 Conclusions The main goal of this
Page 119: 9 Conclusions 111 of future scenari
Page 122 and 123: Appendix A: Examples on Scenario Te
Page 124 and 125: Appendix A: Examples on Scenario Te
Page 126 and 127:
Appendix B: An Example on Decision
Page 128 and 129:
Appendix B: An Example on Decision
Page 130 and 131:
Appendix C: Examples for Locational
Page 132 and 133:
Appendix D: An Example on Computing
Page 134 and 135:
Symbols 126 F fuzzy appropriateness
Page 136 and 137:
Symbols 128 µ mean of load at bus
Page 139 and 140:
References [1] G. Latorre, R. D. Cr
Page 141 and 142:
References 133 [25] H. Sun, and D.
Page 143 and 144:
References 135 [53] H. Rudnick, R.
Page 145 and 146:
Zusammenfassung Das Hauptziel diese
Page 147:
Zusammenfassung 139 Übereinstimmun
show all

Transmission Expansion Planning in Deregulated Power ... - tuprints

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?