11.10.2013 Views

Conference, Proceedings

Conference, Proceedings

Conference, Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3: Basic material parameters of SCC after 28 days<br />

Material ρ [kgm ‐3 ] ρmat [kgm ‐3 ] Ψ [%]<br />

SCC‐3 2410 2720 11<br />

SCC‐4 2320 2560 9.6<br />

Water vapor transport properties<br />

The water vapor transport parameters of the studied SCC are shown in Table 4. The measured<br />

data revealed basic information that the values of water vapor diffusion coefficient<br />

corresponding to the lower values of relative humidity (5‐50%) were always lower than those<br />

for higher relative humidity values (97‐50%). This is in accordance with the previous<br />

measurements on many other materials including concrete. The main reason for this finding is<br />

coupling of water vapor transport with water transport in a material with higher relative<br />

humidity where the capillary condensation takes place in a much higher extent than in the<br />

range of lower relative humidity [10].<br />

The values of water vapor diffusion coefficient of SCC‐3 were about 35% (wet cup) and about<br />

60% (dry cup) higher than for SCC‐4. This is in a qualitative agreement with the open porosity<br />

data in Table 3 as it is quite obvious that a material with higher porosity should transport water<br />

vapor faster than a material with lower porosity.<br />

Table 4: Water vapor transport properties of SCC after 28 days<br />

Material 97‐50%<br />

D [10 ‐6 m 2 s ‐1 ] μ [‐]<br />

RH<br />

50‐5%<br />

RH<br />

97‐50%<br />

RH<br />

50‐5%<br />

RH<br />

SCC‐3 1.53 0.97 15.1 24.5<br />

SCC‐4 1.13 0.58 20.3 39.6<br />

Water transport properties<br />

The results of liquid water transport parameters measurement in Table 5 show that the material<br />

SCC‐3 with higher porosity transported liquid water in a much faster way than the material<br />

SCC‐4. Its water absorption coefficient was by about 35% higher and the moisture diffusivity<br />

about 50% higher compared to SCC‐ 4. Once again, it was a consequence of the secondary<br />

pozzolanic reaction in the analyzed SCC resulting in structure compaction.<br />

Table 5: Water transport properties of SCC after 28 days<br />

Material A [kg m ‐2 s ‐1/2 ] κapp [m 2 s ‐1 ]<br />

SCC‐3 0.0074 4.4E‐09<br />

SCC‐4 0.0055 2.9E‐09<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!