11.10.2013 Views

Conference, Proceedings

Conference, Proceedings

Conference, Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Thermal diffusivity identification procedure<br />

Knowing the parameter l and having obtained the amplitude of temperature response<br />

attenuation ψ and the response phase lag ϕ one can evaluate the parameter k (or directly the<br />

thermal diffusivity a) by solving nonlinear equations (9) and (10). These two solutions should be<br />

the same that creates opportunity for the procedure validation. However, because the solutions<br />

can not be expressed in direct form, and because numerical routine in the case of Eq. (10) is<br />

badly conditioned, the approximations of (9) and (10) are usually applied [1], [2]. These<br />

approximations lead to the following formulae<br />

2<br />

2<br />

π f l π l<br />

a ≅ =<br />

(14)<br />

2 2<br />

2 2<br />

ln τ Ω ln<br />

ψ ψ<br />

2<br />

2<br />

π f l π l<br />

a ≅ =<br />

(15)<br />

2<br />

2<br />

ϕ τ ϕ<br />

Ω<br />

the first of which is the “amplitude” one and the second is the “phase” second respectively. It is<br />

interesting that Eq. (15) has the same form as that obtained for the semi‐infinite solid problem<br />

solution (comp. e.g. [4], [13] and [15]). However these solutions are valid only under the<br />

assumption that the frequency f is high enough i.e.:<br />

2<br />

K min a<br />

k l > K min ⇔ f ><br />

(16)<br />

2<br />

π l<br />

According to [2] the recommended value for Kmin is 1.5. However, for Kmin strictly equal to 1.5<br />

the “amplitude” thermal diffusivity identified when applying Eq. (14) is overestimated by<br />

about 6.5 %. From our own analyses it follows that for<br />

K = . 87 ; K = 2.<br />

25<br />

(17)<br />

min, 2%<br />

1 min, 1 %<br />

the approximation accuracy regarding the identified a value for both procedures is equal to 2 %<br />

and 1 % respectively.<br />

The thermal diffusivity may be determined from amplitude and phase measurements. In both<br />

cases the two temperature signals are analysed: one corresponding to the thermally treated<br />

surface θ(τ,x=l) and the response signal θ(τ,x=0). The two signals are approximated by function<br />

( 2πfτ<br />

+ B)<br />

+ C + Dτ<br />

; n τ ≤ τ < ( n + 1)<br />

τ , n 0,<br />

1 N<br />

f ( τ ) A sin<br />

= ,...,<br />

(18)<br />

= Ω<br />

Ω<br />

and parameters ψ and ϕ are calculated from<br />

Ax=<br />

0,<br />

calc.<br />

ψ = , ϕ = Bx=<br />

l,<br />

calc.<br />

− Bx=<br />

o,<br />

calc.<br />

(19)<br />

A<br />

x=<br />

l,<br />

calc.<br />

where the subscript calc stands for the approximation results. As it follows from (18) the<br />

procedure is applied within time intervals corresponding to every consecutive oscillation<br />

period. Next, the thermal diffusivity can be derived:<br />

- directly from simplified relations (14) and (15);<br />

- after correction of the Eqs (14) and (15) results applying differential formulae;<br />

255

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!