CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:11−cv−62525−WPD - United States ...

Case 0:11-cv-62525-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2011 Page 7 of 31
temporary position for plaintiff and other request on 2007 after I enrned my M mster depee in
education on Oct. 31.2007.
M aterials Fads W ithl EEOC W ith Eo ibits
1- The charge # 510-2011-92262 was filed by EEOC Minmi Florida ofke against plaintitrs
l Broward County School Board (public Schools) on Feb. 1't &2nd But on Feb 03,201 1
emP Oyer . ,
plaintiffamended the llling document / form by oëcial notarized notice as exhibit A 1 to
correct wrong information including correction to EEOC form 5(1 1/09) dated Feb. 02,201 1 l
eoibit M . The discriminatory acts reported by plaintil-oflcially was lbr:- l-age z-national
origin 3-religion 4-sex.
2- The director of EEOC advised Plaintiff that plaintiff must wait for six months to get any
information's including a copy from my employer's response when plaintiffrequested b%ed on
freedom of information act FOIA regulations blzr ljust got only my employer's response few
days ago. Plaintiffreceived nothing till now except the EEOC decision titled trismissal And
Notice Of Rights' which I received it on Sep. 07,201 1 by certified mail for the decision dated on
Aug. 26,201 1 exàibit M . W lile the certified mail receipt has two sides one for plaintifrs
signature only the other side wms indicated different name from the address on the envelope
wllich should be match EEOC address. Therefore plaintiff has to reported it offkialy because the
sender name on the receipt which I have to sign is for EEO witich Eqlnl Education Opportunity
in mv emolover not EEO for Enual Emolovment Onoortuniw which plaintiFhas no business
w1t1 both W lile 1St one couldn't provide any assistnnt the 2nd one only to mssist teachers who has
the poskion title. Why this certified mail receipt for signature has diferent address from the
address for EEOC Minmi oxce who did send the mail'?. n erefore I documentcd to my post
oflice and to EEOC oflke which take time to conirmed the problem and to receive the right
mail send by EEOC which has the decision on the charge against respondent.
3- The decision / order by EEOC Miami office was supported plaintifrs case on one point
of 1aw forjob discrimination but in other point of 1aw the ofice reported incorrect information to
the discriminations acts which never filed by plaintiffthese two points in two separate parts as
folow:-
(a) 1St one the order stated and clarilied one essential statement to support plaintifps
7 ? ff/1t