CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:11−cv−62525−WPD - United States ...

Case 0:11-cv-62525-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2011 Page 26 of 31
as a title while plaintiff wms performing %me task as a teacher with valid teacher certification
and long experiences; But my employer failed to change the title because the salary w41 be
changed accordingly. Respondent want to keep me working but as slave in United States Of
America. Therefore when plaintifprovided her ofticial request for change then defendant
stripped her from even her current position as sub-teacher and from any other reasonable alzd fair
position plaintiffin title for by law.
30- What plaintif got when she-started to pk-e step to -o -btained and protect her right to be
treated enual is to become a homeless and to be on food stamn as $161 / a month as $5.4 / five
dolars and four cent a dav and no housinR available- from so-cial serdces in USA at this time.
While plaintifhms B.S. in Sciences valid teacher certification in Sciences M.S. in education and
up to 10 years clmssroom experiences with te-ns of excellent recommendation / cvaluations.
certilkate for aopreciations an- d perfect atendance and most of a1 never commitled or convicted
with anv crime rather plaintiff alway.s folow the ru-les and never break alw law. ls this what the
future zenerations' life wil b:?
And if the 1aw is different from state to another is FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP can be
change better than SEC. 633. (Section 14) (a) Federal action superseding State action in age
discrimination Act or others Acts; when defendant cause of action wms intentionaly malicious
and Ilnfair to cause Imnecessary harm. When the reason indicated in employees' E-mail and
reflected in their action how they behaved against plaintiFwith no reason
Conclusipp
Plaintif f has no body represented her or acting in her behave in
this matter or any other matter. Plaintiff has no any type of
agree ent with any body nor plaintif f signed any sort of
agreement with any body, agency, community, individuals or any
employpr.
The EEOC Equal Employment Opportunity Local Office decision provided support statement as
stated that t this does not certilk that the respo-ndent is in compliance with the statutes 1 but the
EEOC oftke further claimed that lthey are unable to conclude the matter) in other word
investigator unable to enforce the Iaw / and or to adopt the case for relief The investigation simply was
26