CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:11−cv−62525−WPD - United States ...

Case 0:11-cv-62525-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2011 Page 25 of 31
personal opinions and the unethical behaviors on April 16,2010 agninst me without any calzse of
actions by plaintiffbut vise versa. W hen l wms simply msking tbr direction to the classroom to do
myjob on April 16,2010 but they enforced me not to work while their behaviors prohibited and
ptmishable by law. My employer did nothing rather was wrongful termination to plaintiffwho
was a victim of crime which ptmishable by 1aw under providing false information to authority
and cause harm in free harm societies law provisions. Their evaluation letters defined their
personality and it can'tjustifled such wrongful termination to plaintiffwhile there was no cause
of action by plaintiffor any violation to any law.
28- Plaintiffqualifkation and long years through diversity environment w1t1 assorted
diferences assisted and equipped her with tools to be able to response, tolerate, to react and to
accept al other people opinions and differences which plaintiff wms handling any problem based
on understandable clue about what is human begin is and what its our life a1 aboutl. My
experiences was fascinated one with schools board because it was a research studies for me
which %sisted me to build concert foundation for useful science projects for talented and
especial need sttzdents as wel. ln addition to a1 other assorted recommendation 1 provided to
each public school 1 visited from al Global Teaching and Learning Conferences conducted by
Nova Southeastem University in Orlando Florida and other scientilk orgnnization like National
Science Teacher Associations NSTA and many others. My experiences wasn/tjust sub-teacher
for me it was priceless experiences which a1 about how to operate the education system as a role
model not only academicaly but with value generated from our o1d golden rules as one hlman
begin family which where to shape al creations as a advance civilization not vise versa.
29- Therefore plaintiff must respond and must stnnd even if by her self against any
immorality action at any time any where. In addition plaintiffsimply was refusing any form of
slavery any where. Defendant has two different departments should mssist in this matter and to
provide reasonable resolution and fair accommodation. But %sistant was declined by EEO
which is for Equal Education Opportmity because is not related to this case forjob
discrimination as they informed me while the other depnrtment which cary snme privations as !
EEO but different word and meanina which for Equal Emplom ent Opportunitv. But thev l l
informed that plaintiffas substimte teacher position has no union and they helping only teachers i
25 p1 l
tl