CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:11−cv−62525−WPD - United States ...

Case 0:11-cv-62525-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2011 Page 12 of 31
personal at the fair.
7- knowing and reviewing these evaluations was a critical primary factor in the case based
on the pervious false evaluations on May 29,2002 as listed in ex.# A8&A9 and other one which
E wms dissolved based on my resmnse and record to indicate the fact. But the new discovery was
defendant added evaluation never seen by plaintiff to be a part from these six evaluation for
wrongful planed termination. Only aher 5 months when 1 attempted to get them ms a matter of
1aw to know what caused this harm to my long mofessional career and education. Also aher the
instructional staffing director / Rockleman action occured on Oct. 05,2010 which asking me to
leave the job fair open for public at signature grant. knowing and reviewing these evaluation was
critical and the core of the subject matter as wms new discovery when another 1wo evaluations
issued on 2006 and never provided to plaintiffbut considered with these six letters for intentional
discriminatory action in. ln addition plaintiffknows what she did since she s'tarted herjob on
2000/2001 til now.
n erefore how we can make determination on false or true question without knowing the
guestion'?. Even if sub-teacher have to sign form stated that f three or more negative
letters then the sub-teacher name wil be removed from sub-teacher list (sub-teacher
positionl) . But must be legally proven to b-e tm- e -as com- mon sense if is not even required
by law. But at the end of the day statement does not also stated that from the entire
emplover but stated that çfz'om sub-teacher's position tlist) ' when the nosition limited to
be in the clmssroom only while ve eties-of-iob oppo-rtppity available at different
departments. positions. and buildinqs in this narticular emplover. Wlzich in contrarv to
any other employers in US which occunied with a1 labor levels and salary started from
minimum wages to highest one which similar to the presented of USA. Nevertheless the
guestion is if these evaluation letters true or false'?. Also was orovided on time for
emplovee's to response or not? In addition this kind of evaluation for this oarticular
position it must be conducted for termination pupose in the verv beginning to alnnn the
emplovees to change their career awav 9om classroom settinM wltile there is another
varieties of positions and departments alwavs h@s iob opinina. But olaintiff has excelent !
three of them when she started which-
alow her conthmation 10 vears in the classroom.
/
1
12 l