CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:11−cv−62525−WPD - United States ...

Case 0:11-cv-62525-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2011 Page 10 of 31
begnning my nnme wms highly recommended b%ed on my qualiscation which should be beter
now not vise versa. But respondent prevented me from any access to re%onable job assigmnents
or for reasonable and fair position while sub-teacher position was temporary position for
plaintiff.
3- 1 received instructional staffing Dep. Letter to remove my name from substitute teacher's
list dated April 28,2010 attached exhibit # A6 which issued based on six tklse evaluations some
of them plaintiff never saw .On this date plaintit-f was working therefore l didn't get pay as
payrol depnrfment advised that how we can pay you and there is a record you are off any
position with the employer. The evaluations letters should be attached to defendant's decision
but it wasn't and the decision come aher my oftkial request dated Jan. 02, 2010 to
superintendent / James Notter exhibit. A 7 -A12 for promotion and also to science department
regarding my science projects which plaintiffplanning to implemented in science subject area for
Middle Schools with other essential following dated exhibits in the case. 'Fhe new innovations
based long years of experiences as a chemist in research and development pharmaceuticals and
medicals laboratories. while my entire education, experiences and my passionate desire always
colmected with science research. Plnintiffobtained her teacher certifkation in science, and
enrned my Master Degree in management and administration / educational leadership to be able
to implemented her new innovations on concert foundation based on science education standnrds
in order for young generation to achieve better life for al1 mankind not only for a better academic
achievement.
4- n ese false evaluations letters never been atached with the employer's decision on April
28,2010 not only that but also must be provided to plaintiffpreviously at the time when it was
issued while some of them issued on 2006. lt is mandatory as a matter of law to know who said
what where and why which must by disclose on time also must be a tnze not false. It wms
essential in my case because of pervious tàlse evaluation in May 29, 2002 which issued by
school which plaintiffnever worked with because I'm never worked at any elementary schools
while this school's principal did use the leter head of Broward Schools and signed false report
dated May 29,2002 exhibit A13 . After plaintilrs review her record plus my employer
10 J lf
1
l