CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:11−cv−62525−WPD - United States ...

Case 0:11-cv-62525-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2011 Page 17 of 31
respond to a11 these false evaluation in this compliant with exhibits as complete response. Other
false evaluation with no re%on at Coral Glades Middle high school evaluation never provided to
plaintiffon time for response which done on March 02,2007 and writing report in March 05,2007
by Sub-coordinator / Judy Berman was when she asked me for my driver license to make a copy 1
informed her that 1 have to ask my department sub-central at the district first who are open daily
at 6:00 am. My concern because was new request by this school since my work on 2000/2001
school year and there was no notification for us about such request to make a copy. 1 don't know
what the crime plnintiff did commit or what violation of 1aw is it? Therefore another false
evaluation issued by tlzis sub-coordinator exhibit M 1 Corat G. H. R'he 1St response to the six
evaluations was after l received what my employer send to me aher Oct. 05,2010. Therefore I did
send my written response to my employer dated Oct. 29,2010 exhibit B1 / attachments B based
on what I got after Oet. 05,2010. while complete response to entire evaluations since plaintiff
started on 2000/2001 till the wrongful termination on April 28.2010 explained in this compliant
as total and final from EEOC which a1 eight (8) false evaluations some of them l'm never
worked with and other never exist or never provided to me on time for response or plaintiff did
response and dissolved.
15- lt is understandable that sub-teacher signed paper that after tlree negative evaluations or
more will take her/his nnme offthe sub-teacher position which must be in very beginning
working a11 over the schools which plaintif already got a11 her true rewards evaluations in order
for continuation in class room and approval by HRD (human resomces development ) and by
other professional as a snmples back on year 2000/2001 exhibit A 33-A41.
Therefore plaintiTs nualification and performance bv now should be better not vise versa aAer
plaintifeamed her M.S in management and ae inistration educational leadership, teacher
certifkation and a1l other certifications and rtcommendation as new ones listed including my
updated reslme exhibits A42-A47 also a sample as ex.#20-23
The primary essential questions now is it is true or false evaluations? it is a hate crime involved
or not? The plaintiff as employee informed with each evaluation on time or not? And what the
out come of the plaintiff 's response ?. Is it the fact of cause of action wms misconduct, bullings
l 7 l l
4