14.11.2013 Views

download pdf version of PhD book - Universiteit Utrecht

download pdf version of PhD book - Universiteit Utrecht

download pdf version of PhD book - Universiteit Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6. Dispersivity under Partially-Saturated Conditions<br />

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

through all pore throats at the inlet or outlet boundary <strong>of</strong> the network), L is<br />

the network length in the flow direction, V f is total fluid volume, θ is porosity,<br />

and A is cross-sectional area <strong>of</strong> the network perpendicular to the overall flow<br />

direction.<br />

Knowing the total discharge through the network, we can also calculate the<br />

relative permeability. The relative permeability <strong>of</strong> the network to water at a<br />

given saturation and capillary pressure is calculated from Darcy’s law<br />

k rw =<br />

µ wQ t<br />

k A ∆P/L<br />

(6.14)<br />

where µ is the wetting phase viscosity, k is the intrinsic permeability, and ∆P<br />

is the pressure difference between inflow and outflow reservoirs.<br />

Repetition <strong>of</strong> this process at consecutively larger imposed capillary pressures<br />

results in a graph <strong>of</strong> capillary pressure versus wetting saturation and relative<br />

permeability versus wetting saturation.<br />

6.4.2 Simulating solute transport through the network<br />

Commonly, under saturated conditions, one average concentration is assigned<br />

to each pore body or throat [Rao<strong>of</strong> et al., 2010, Li et al., 2006a, Acharya et al.,<br />

2005a, Sugita et al., 1995a]. This is done assuming that each pore space is a<br />

connected well-mixed domain and that diffusion is fast enough compared to the<br />

fluid flow within individual pores (i.e., gradients in concentration are negligible<br />

within a single pore). This assumption may be reasonable under saturated<br />

conditions, but, under partially saturated conditions the situation is different.<br />

Under partially saturated conditions, in the case <strong>of</strong> cubic pore body, we have<br />

eight corner units, each comprised <strong>of</strong> a corner domain together with half <strong>of</strong><br />

the three neighboring edges, as shown in Figure (6.3). Thus, we assign eight<br />

different concentrations to a drained pore body, one for each corner unit. In<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> drained pore throats, we assign different concentrations to each pore<br />

throat edge.<br />

Thus, in our formulation, the unknowns will be either concentrations <strong>of</strong> saturated<br />

pore bodies, c i , and saturated pore throats, c ij , or concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

edges <strong>of</strong> drained pore throats, c ij,k , and corner units <strong>of</strong> drained pore bodies,<br />

c CU,i . We assume that each corner unit is a fully mixed domain. To show the<br />

formulation, we introduce mass balance equations for a system <strong>of</strong> two drained<br />

pores connected using a drained pore throat, as the most general case. We<br />

assume that flow is from corner unit j towards corner unit i through corners <strong>of</strong><br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!