download pdf version of PhD book - Universiteit Utrecht
download pdf version of PhD book - Universiteit Utrecht
download pdf version of PhD book - Universiteit Utrecht
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6. Dispersivity under Partially-Saturated Conditions<br />
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />
through all pore throats at the inlet or outlet boundary <strong>of</strong> the network), L is<br />
the network length in the flow direction, V f is total fluid volume, θ is porosity,<br />
and A is cross-sectional area <strong>of</strong> the network perpendicular to the overall flow<br />
direction.<br />
Knowing the total discharge through the network, we can also calculate the<br />
relative permeability. The relative permeability <strong>of</strong> the network to water at a<br />
given saturation and capillary pressure is calculated from Darcy’s law<br />
k rw =<br />
µ wQ t<br />
k A ∆P/L<br />
(6.14)<br />
where µ is the wetting phase viscosity, k is the intrinsic permeability, and ∆P<br />
is the pressure difference between inflow and outflow reservoirs.<br />
Repetition <strong>of</strong> this process at consecutively larger imposed capillary pressures<br />
results in a graph <strong>of</strong> capillary pressure versus wetting saturation and relative<br />
permeability versus wetting saturation.<br />
6.4.2 Simulating solute transport through the network<br />
Commonly, under saturated conditions, one average concentration is assigned<br />
to each pore body or throat [Rao<strong>of</strong> et al., 2010, Li et al., 2006a, Acharya et al.,<br />
2005a, Sugita et al., 1995a]. This is done assuming that each pore space is a<br />
connected well-mixed domain and that diffusion is fast enough compared to the<br />
fluid flow within individual pores (i.e., gradients in concentration are negligible<br />
within a single pore). This assumption may be reasonable under saturated<br />
conditions, but, under partially saturated conditions the situation is different.<br />
Under partially saturated conditions, in the case <strong>of</strong> cubic pore body, we have<br />
eight corner units, each comprised <strong>of</strong> a corner domain together with half <strong>of</strong><br />
the three neighboring edges, as shown in Figure (6.3). Thus, we assign eight<br />
different concentrations to a drained pore body, one for each corner unit. In<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> drained pore throats, we assign different concentrations to each pore<br />
throat edge.<br />
Thus, in our formulation, the unknowns will be either concentrations <strong>of</strong> saturated<br />
pore bodies, c i , and saturated pore throats, c ij , or concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />
edges <strong>of</strong> drained pore throats, c ij,k , and corner units <strong>of</strong> drained pore bodies,<br />
c CU,i . We assume that each corner unit is a fully mixed domain. To show the<br />
formulation, we introduce mass balance equations for a system <strong>of</strong> two drained<br />
pores connected using a drained pore throat, as the most general case. We<br />
assume that flow is from corner unit j towards corner unit i through corners <strong>of</strong><br />
142