download pdf version of PhD book - Universiteit Utrecht
download pdf version of PhD book - Universiteit Utrecht
download pdf version of PhD book - Universiteit Utrecht
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. Upscaling <strong>of</strong> Adsorbing Solutes; Pore Scale<br />
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />
and Brantley, 2003, Maher et al., 2004]. Then the question arises as to what<br />
extent pore scale reaction models and parameters are applicable at the macroscale.<br />
Recently, Meile and Tuncay [2006] addressed this question for the case <strong>of</strong> mineral<br />
dissolution and homogenous reaction with the aid <strong>of</strong> a pore-scale numerical<br />
model. They found that macro-scale descriptions <strong>of</strong> these processes are different<br />
from pore-scale descriptions because <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> small-scale gradients<br />
in concentration fields. To investigate these effects, they numerically generated<br />
virtual porous media using random placement <strong>of</strong> identical spherical particles<br />
and solved diffusion and reaction in the resulting pore spaces. They showed<br />
that upscaled values <strong>of</strong> reaction and dissolution rates depend on the type <strong>of</strong><br />
reaction, pore geometry, and macroscopic concentration gradient. They found<br />
that differences between these two scales become more significant for surface<br />
reactions as compared to homogeneous reactions. A limitation in the work<br />
<strong>of</strong> Meile and Tuncay [2006] is that they considered only diffusion transport<br />
and neglected advection. Other modeling studies have shown that the role<br />
<strong>of</strong> advection on the distribution <strong>of</strong> chemicals at the pore level is very important<br />
(e.g., Bryant and Thompson [2001], Knutson et al. [2001a], Robinson and<br />
Viswanathan [2003], Szecsody et al. [1998]).<br />
Li et al. [2006b] studied the effect <strong>of</strong> pore-scale concentration gradients on a<br />
mineral dissolution rate influenced by advection. They introduced two kinds <strong>of</strong><br />
models for minerals that could dissolve at different rates. First, they developed<br />
a Poiseuille flow model that coupled the reaction rate to both advection and<br />
diffusion within a pore space. Next they developed a “well-mixed reaction”<br />
model that assumed complete mixing within the pore. They have shown that<br />
concentration gradients could cause scale dependence <strong>of</strong> reaction rates. Significant<br />
concentration gradients would develop when diffusion is slower than the<br />
advection process, provided that rates <strong>of</strong> advection and reaction are comparable.<br />
This shows the effect <strong>of</strong> pore-scale gradients and residence times on the<br />
transport <strong>of</strong> reactive solutes. The effect <strong>of</strong> residence times on reactive transport<br />
was also addressed by Robinson and Viswanathan [2003], who showed the importance<br />
<strong>of</strong> pore-scale gradients, especially for nonlinear reactions; solute pulses<br />
<strong>of</strong> short duration; and systems with broad residence time distribution curves.<br />
Characteristic timescales <strong>of</strong> reaction processes pose constraints for transport<br />
models [Mo and Friedly, 2000, Cao and Kitanidis, 1998].<br />
Experimental studies (e.g., Guo and Thompson [2001]) as well as pore-scale<br />
numerical models [Knutson et al., 2001a] have shown the dependence <strong>of</strong> mass<br />
44