15.11.2013 Views

Moose River Basin: geology and mineral potential - Geology Ontario

Moose River Basin: geology and mineral potential - Geology Ontario

Moose River Basin: geology and mineral potential - Geology Ontario

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Moose</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Basin</strong><br />

by Hamblin (this report), abundant lignite detritus in one sample at 116.3 m<br />

may indicate a minor Cretaceous erosional residue between the Pleistocene<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Middle Jurassic sediments.<br />

Age <strong>and</strong> Correlation<br />

A detailed account of the palynologically determined age of the Mistuskwia<br />

Beds is provided by Norris (1977; this report). The u,nit is Middle Jurassic in<br />

age <strong>and</strong> correlative with the Upper Gravelbourg, Sawtooth <strong>and</strong> Shaunavon<br />

Formations of southern Alberta <strong>and</strong> Saskatchewan.<br />

MATTAGAMI FORMATION<br />

Keele (1920) proposed the name Mattagami series for nonlithified, lignite<br />

bearing s<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> clays overlying Upper Devonian strata along the Mattagami<br />

<strong>River</strong> in the general vicinity of Onakawana. He was followed by Dyer (1928)<br />

who designated these Mesozoic sediments as the Mattagami Formation. No<br />

type section of the unit was proposed then, or has been proposed in any subse<br />

quent studies, <strong>and</strong> no single exposure of the entire Mattagami Formation is<br />

known. As noted previously, numerous drillholes in the Onakawana <strong>and</strong><br />

Smoky Falls-Hambly Township area have provided complete sections of the<br />

formation <strong>and</strong> it may be useful to designate one or more of these as reference<br />

sections.<br />

Two of the better documented recent drillholes that could serve as refer<br />

ence sections are the Hambly No. l hole (Figure 2.9), drilled by Aquitaine Sogepet<br />

et al. (1973), <strong>and</strong> drillhole 75-06 of the <strong>Ontario</strong> Geological Survey winter<br />

1975 drilling programme (Figure 2.8). Both holes intersected complete sections<br />

of the Mattagami Formation <strong>and</strong> encountered a combination of lithologies that<br />

is very typical of the unit. An added feature of the Hambly No. l hole was the<br />

down-hole geophysical logging (gamma-ray; neutron activation) carried out<br />

concurrently with the drilling.<br />

Distribution <strong>and</strong> Thickness<br />

Distribution of the Mattagami Formation in the <strong>Moose</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> was<br />

discussed previously. The lateral extent of the unit cannot be defined precisely.<br />

However, it is thought to extend, virtually continuously, around the eastern<br />

<strong>and</strong> southern margins of the basin from the Portage Isl<strong>and</strong> area in the north<br />

east to Burstall Township in the southwest. The winter 1975 drilling found the<br />

unit as far north as drillhole 75-02, about 50 km north of the Precambrian es<br />

carpment. Surface exposures of the Mattagami Formation occur in the north<br />

east near Portage Isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Onakawana, in the southeast along Adam Creek<br />

(Photo 2.5) <strong>and</strong> the Mattagami <strong>River</strong> in Kipling Township, <strong>and</strong> along the Missi-<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!