27.12.2013 Views

View PDF Version - RePub

View PDF Version - RePub

View PDF Version - RePub

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- a proportionally larger part of the land is uncultivated and fallow<br />

periods are longer;<br />

.",.- a larger-proportion-is-{more}-permanently-plantedwith-perennialtree-crops;<br />

- relatively more tenants on these lands.<br />

If, with a view to testing these hypotheses on the effects of distance, or for<br />

statistical reasons, we contrast the figures for the two nearby lands of<br />

Odompem and Amoanda (N = 193)6 with those for two more distant<br />

lands, Osekyerew and Edumenu (N = 63), the results are as follows:<br />

Hypothesis 1: Table 16 shows that the difference on this score is very<br />

striking. While almost half (46070) of all those cultivating on the nearer lands<br />

were given farming rights because they were related to the landowning<br />

families through their father, marriage or friendship, this holds only in one<br />

out of six cases (16%) for the more distant lands.<br />

Table 16:<br />

Paternal Relati'l'es, In-laws and Friends on<br />

More Nearby and More Distant Lands<br />

Abs<br />

The more nearby family lands 86<br />

The more distant family lands 10<br />

Total 96<br />

0/0 N=<br />

46 188<br />

16 63<br />

38 251<br />

Hypothesis2: Of the total acreage of farmland surveyed and measured on<br />

the more nearby family lands, as much as 87% was devoted to (annual)<br />

foodcrops.<br />

In Table 17 we see that this differs significantly from the more<br />

distant lands where 52% of the planted area was under food crops.<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!