27.12.2013 Views

View PDF Version - RePub

View PDF Version - RePub

View PDF Version - RePub

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 17:<br />

Percentage of Area Devoted to Food Crops on<br />

More Nearby and More Distant Lands<br />

Acreage on<br />

foodcrops<br />

Total<br />

acreage'<br />

070<br />

The more nearby family lands 81.3 93.9<br />

The more distant family lands 35.9 68.5<br />

Total 117.2 162.4<br />

87<br />

52<br />

72<br />

This difference becomes even more significant if we consider the acreages<br />

per farmer which, on the two categories offamily lands, were planted with<br />

food crops. While on the nearer lands the acreage per farmer amounted<br />

to 2.5, on the more distant lands this was somewhat less than one acre<br />

(0.95). This suggests that on nearby lands like Odompem and Amoanda<br />

food crops such as cassava, maize and plantain are much more frequently<br />

grown for the market and not only for subsistence.<br />

Hypothesis 3: The expectation that, in view of the more frequent<br />

cultivation of food crops on the nearer lands and with the need to lose less<br />

time on travelling, more of those farming there than on distant family lands<br />

would be women, is corroborated by the difference of the percentages in<br />

Table 18: on Osekyerew and Edumenu just over one-third of all farms in<br />

the sample (or 35%) belonged to female farmers, but on Odompem and<br />

Amoanda this was almost half (or 47 % ).<br />

Table 18:<br />

Percentage of Female Farmers on Nearby and<br />

on More Distant Lands<br />

Abs. %<br />

The more nearby family lands 90 47<br />

The more distant family lands 22 35<br />

Total 112 44<br />

N=<br />

192<br />

63<br />

255<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!