Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
cluded in the Farm Census, or more than 40070, were of immigrant origin.<br />
To deduce from these figures that about 60% of the 255 farmers<br />
are therefore from landholding lineages would be quite correct insofar as<br />
this is not taken to mean that they are farming on the land of their own<br />
families. Only about three-fifths of all those belonging to landholding<br />
families (87 or 59%) cultivate the land of their own family; another 61 (or<br />
41 %) cultivate the land of other families (see Thble 9).<br />
Table 9:<br />
Farmers on Four Family Lands by Indigenous and<br />
Immigrant Lineage Membership<br />
Family Lands Odompen Amoanda Osekyerew Edumenu Total<br />
Lineage membership<br />
of farmers Abs "10<br />
A. Farmers from<br />
Landholding Families 19 89 19 21 14 58<br />
1. On Their Own<br />
Family Land 10 48 17 12 87 34<br />
2. On Other's<br />
Family Lands 9 41 2 9 61 24<br />
B. Farmers from<br />
Non-LandholdingFamilies<br />
23 62 17 107 42<br />
3. Members of<br />
Immigrant Ebusua 18 46 10 74 29<br />
4. Non-Associated<br />
Immigrants 5 16 5 7 33 13<br />
Total 42 151 24 38 255 100<br />
We can only conclude that the way in which farmland is actually<br />
allocated is very different from what would be expected on the basis of the<br />
simple formula that states that it is on the land of one's family that one can<br />
legitimately claim to farm. The question then is on what auxiliary or<br />
alternative formulae the allocation is really based and whether these<br />
formulae are in line with, or contrary to, the original land tenure<br />
arrangements.<br />
87