27.12.2013 Views

View PDF Version - RePub

View PDF Version - RePub

View PDF Version - RePub

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cluded in the Farm Census, or more than 40070, were of immigrant origin.<br />

To deduce from these figures that about 60% of the 255 farmers<br />

are therefore from landholding lineages would be quite correct insofar as<br />

this is not taken to mean that they are farming on the land of their own<br />

families. Only about three-fifths of all those belonging to landholding<br />

families (87 or 59%) cultivate the land of their own family; another 61 (or<br />

41 %) cultivate the land of other families (see Thble 9).<br />

Table 9:<br />

Farmers on Four Family Lands by Indigenous and<br />

Immigrant Lineage Membership<br />

Family Lands Odompen Amoanda Osekyerew Edumenu Total<br />

Lineage membership<br />

of farmers Abs "10<br />

A. Farmers from<br />

Landholding Families 19 89 19 21 14 58<br />

1. On Their Own<br />

Family Land 10 48 17 12 87 34<br />

2. On Other's<br />

Family Lands 9 41 2 9 61 24<br />

B. Farmers from<br />

Non-LandholdingFamilies<br />

23 62 17 107 42<br />

3. Members of<br />

Immigrant Ebusua 18 46 10 74 29<br />

4. Non-Associated<br />

Immigrants 5 16 5 7 33 13<br />

Total 42 151 24 38 255 100<br />

We can only conclude that the way in which farmland is actually<br />

allocated is very different from what would be expected on the basis of the<br />

simple formula that states that it is on the land of one's family that one can<br />

legitimately claim to farm. The question then is on what auxiliary or<br />

alternative formulae the allocation is really based and whether these<br />

formulae are in line with, or contrary to, the original land tenure<br />

arrangements.<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!