You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
sense <strong>of</strong> shear. Type 3 Shatter Zone must be related to Types 1 and 2, which<br />
have been confirmed as explosive.<br />
The transition from fractal to non-fractal CSD slope for Type 3 Bar Harbor<br />
clasts requires a significant change in mechanism, implying that some major<br />
secondary modification process was at work to alter the size and shape <strong>of</strong> clasts.<br />
This modification mechanism is unable to provide a self-similar size distribution,<br />
which ties in to the marked drop in Bar Harbor clast abundance. CBS and CCA<br />
data imply increased clast wear with proximity to the Cadillac Mountain Granite,<br />
which also supports the hypo<strong>thesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> secondary modification having a<br />
noticeable effect on the alteration <strong>of</strong> Type 3 Bar Harbor clasts. In all cases, D r<br />
decreases and circularity increases with closer proximity to the Cadillac Mountain<br />
Granite interface. Much like CSD, one cannot interpret CBS as a complete<br />
product <strong>of</strong> the brecciation event; it is more a manifestation <strong>of</strong> secondary<br />
modification. If the clasts <strong>of</strong> Type 3 were originally as angular as Types 1 and 2,<br />
CCA data show that there is substantial clast rounding after the major explosive<br />
event. Possible modification mechanis<strong>ms</strong> include thermal disaggregation, fluid<br />
assisted fracture, and thermal induced fracture. These potential mechanis<strong>ms</strong> are<br />
fully discussed in the next chapter.<br />
89