You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
eaction processes were involved in the formation <strong>of</strong> the Shatter Zone, so a D r<br />
value greater than 1.25 would not be expected (Jebrak, 1997; Lorrileaux et al.,<br />
2002).<br />
5.3.5. Clast Circularity Analysis<br />
Although it is not a fractal property, circularity is directly influenced by the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> abrasion, dilation, and transport that occurs in the development <strong>of</strong> a<br />
breccia, and it could prove important in comparing modified and unmodified<br />
clasts (e.g. Dellino and Volpe, 1996, Clark, 1990). The greater the wear on the<br />
clast, the more circular it will become owing to loss <strong>of</strong> high surface-area corners.<br />
Circularity is a measure <strong>of</strong> the compactness <strong>of</strong> a shape, unlike boundary analysis<br />
which is meant to quantify the complexity <strong>of</strong> surface patterns. Because a circle is<br />
the most compact two-dimensional geometry, a shape’s compactness is<br />
compared to the circle as the ratio<br />
(5.7)<br />
To calculate circularity <strong>of</strong> a clast, its area and perimeter must be determined.<br />
Consider the area <strong>of</strong> a circle:<br />
(5.8)<br />
To define the area <strong>of</strong> a circle as a function <strong>of</strong> a given perimeter (the perimeter <strong>of</strong><br />
the noncircular clast), r must be replaced with p:<br />
(5.9)<br />
62