- Page 1 and 2: FRACTAL ANALYSIS AND THERMAL-ELASTI
- Page 3 and 4: LIBRARY RIGHTS STATEMENT In present
- Page 5 and 6: emplacement of mafic magma, resulti
- Page 7 and 8: © 2011 Samuel Geoffrey Roy All Rig
- Page 9 and 10: TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- Page 11 and 12: 5.3.5. Clast Circularity Analysis .
- Page 13: LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1. Figure
- Page 17 and 18: subvolcanic magmatic systems, the l
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING 2.1. Reg
- Page 21 and 22: Somesville granite suite to the wes
- Page 23 and 24: Biotite is metamorphic in origin, a
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 3 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF S
- Page 27 and 28: thinned lithosphere allows for part
- Page 29 and 30: A B C Figure 3.1. Formation of a la
- Page 31 and 32: 1997; Branney and Kokelaar, 1998; J
- Page 33 and 34: Effusive-Type Eruption max 10 0 - 1
- Page 35 and 36: magma quickly intrudes the develope
- Page 37 and 38: Piston Downsag Piecemeal Funnel Tra
- Page 39 and 40: fragmentation, and thermal energy h
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 4 THERMAL FRAMEWORK FOR CON
- Page 43 and 44: contrast, conduction is heat transf
- Page 45 and 46: A B Grt C Grt D Crd Crd E 1 mm F Cr
- Page 47 and 48: ! ! ! ! Biotite Zone Garnet Zone !
- Page 49 and 50: 4.3.1. Model Setup The model is use
- Page 51 and 52: to make a “hockey puck” style g
- Page 53 and 54: t = 0s t = 1E11 t = 1E12s t = 1E13s
- Page 55 and 56: 850 750 650 550 450 400m Into Chamb
- Page 57 and 58: approximately 140m thinner. The Sha
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 5 ROCK MECHANICS AND THE FR
- Page 61 and 62: A β δ σ 1 σ 3 σ t c a σ 1 σ
- Page 63 and 64: friction along the closed crack sur
- Page 65 and 66:
h h/2 h/4 Figure 5.2. A cube displa
- Page 67 and 68:
where N (≥r) is the count of clas
- Page 69 and 70:
to place a minimum size limit when
- Page 71 and 72:
moment of sudden fracture tip failu
- Page 73 and 74:
produced results in a self-similar
- Page 75 and 76:
13 ln(area) (pixels) 12 11 10 9 ln(
- Page 77 and 78:
eaction processes were involved in
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 6 ANALYSIS AND RESULTS The
- Page 81 and 82:
Type 1 Type 2 500 m N Type 1 Type 2
- Page 83 and 84:
A B Figure 6.3. Type 2 Shatter Zone
- Page 85 and 86:
A B Figure 6.5. Centimeter-scale bo
- Page 87 and 88:
A B Figure 6.6. Brecciation texture
- Page 89 and 90:
The final breccia classified in thi
- Page 91 and 92:
esolution images of each box were s
- Page 93 and 94:
Clast circularity data were produce
- Page 95 and 96:
A 1000 Clast Size Distribu on: Type
- Page 97 and 98:
diorite dike with D s = 2.62 and R
- Page 99 and 100:
6.3.3. Clast Circularity Analysis (
- Page 101 and 102:
with decreasing clast size in all T
- Page 103 and 104:
possibilities as postulated previou
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 7 MECHANISMS FOR SECONDARY
- Page 107 and 108:
magma. To prove the viability of th
- Page 109 and 110:
mesh to better evaluate large therm
- Page 111 and 112:
consistent with Type 3 breccias. Th
- Page 113 and 114:
A temperature versus time plot was
- Page 115 and 116:
Dimensionless time 0 0.05 0.1 0.15
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure 7.4 displays model results f
- Page 119 and 120:
thermal model ignores advection of
- Page 121 and 122:
Zone experienced a relatively weake
- Page 123 and 124:
7.4. Thermal-Induced Fracture Field
- Page 125 and 126:
Metapelite/hornfels Diorite dike E
- Page 127 and 128:
7.4.2. Results and Discussion COMSO
- Page 129 and 130:
This thermal fracture model explain
- Page 131 and 132:
disaggregation of Bar Harbor clasts
- Page 133 and 134:
REFERENCES Acocella, V. (2007). Und
- Page 135 and 136:
Billen, M.I. and Gurnis, M. (2001).
- Page 137 and 138:
Clarke, D. B. (2007). Assimilation
- Page 139 and 140:
Fisher, R.V. (1960). Classification
- Page 141 and 142:
Hartmann, W.K. (1969). Terrestrial,
- Page 143 and 144:
Johnson, S.E.; Paterson, S.R.; Tate
- Page 145 and 146:
Mandelbrot, B.B. (1967). How long i
- Page 147 and 148:
Oliver, N.H.S.; Rubenach, M.J.; Fu,
- Page 149 and 150:
Schoutens, J.E. (1979). Empirical A
- Page 151 and 152:
Wiebe, R.; Holden, J.; Coombs, M.;