03.01.2014 Views

Disability Services Commission Annual Report

Disability Services Commission Annual Report

Disability Services Commission Annual Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2 Service <strong>Report</strong>s — Individual Coordination<br />

Five Years at a Glance<br />

Measure 2003–04 2004–05 2005–06 2006–07 2007–08<br />

Total service users accessing LAC 6,981 7,169 7,605 7,836 8,285<br />

Coordination<br />

Total service users accessing LAC 1,465 1,547 1,521 1,521 1,470<br />

Direct Consumer Funding<br />

Av. cost/service user accessing $2,367 $2,393 $2,427 $2,542 $2,469<br />

LAC Coordination<br />

Av. cost/service user accessing $7,853 $7,673 $7,360 $6,772 $6,563<br />

LAC Direct Consumer Funding<br />

Total cost ($’000) $28,032 $29,027 $29,655 $30,219 $30,101<br />

Consumer satisfaction 78% Not<br />

measured<br />

65% Not<br />

measured<br />

53%<br />

Note:<br />

(a) The 2003–2004 client satisfaction measure has been amended to indicate satisfaction by<br />

respondents of all ages.<br />

(b) The average cost per service user for 2004–2005 for LAC Coordination and for LAC Direct<br />

Consumer Funding and the number of service users accessing LAC Direct Consumer Funding in<br />

2004–2005 have been recalculated retrospectively to adjust for miscoding of data.<br />

Access to LAC Coordination has increased by 19 per cent over the past five years,<br />

while cost per service user has remained steady. The trends in the data for LAC<br />

Direct Consumer Funding reflect the recommendations of the 2003 LAC Review to<br />

reduce the amount of direct consumer funding provided by LAC by transferring<br />

complex, self managed program funding to agency managed or shared management<br />

options. <strong>Report</strong>ed satisfaction with LAC services has declined over the five years.<br />

While some of the decline in reported satisfaction is largely explained by an increase<br />

in the number of respondents reporting as either ‘in between’ or ‘don’t know’, the net<br />

dissatisfaction with LAC has increased slightly from 10 per cent in 2004 to 15 per<br />

cent in 2008. A number of changes are currently in train to enhance the<br />

responsiveness of LAC, including the development of a new outcomes quality<br />

framework; new recruitment and retention strategies; the introduction of individual<br />

planning agreements with individuals, families and carers; and a review of direct<br />

consumer funding strategies.<br />

Major Achievements 2007–2008<br />

Independent living was a focus of Individual Coordination during 2007–2008. As part<br />

of this, initiatives aimed at increasing opportunities for young adults to live<br />

independently were implemented. For example, the Home2Home program in<br />

Bunbury commenced to support young adults to live independently away from the<br />

family home. Young people were also assisted with the transition from school to<br />

community living with the <strong>Commission</strong> partnering with the Department of Education<br />

and Training on this initiative.<br />

Meanwhile, to support adults to live independently and participate in the community,<br />

initiatives were also developed through flexible family support funding. In addition,<br />

36 <strong>Disability</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2007–2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!