13.01.2014 Views

Safe Quarry - Health and Safety Authority

Safe Quarry - Health and Safety Authority

Safe Quarry - Health and Safety Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART 6 EXCAVATIONS INCLUDING (QUARRY FACES), TIPS AND LAGOONS<br />

(6) The operator shall ensure that -<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

any significant findings, <strong>and</strong><br />

any conclusions reached <strong>and</strong> the reasons<br />

for those conclusions made under an<br />

appraisal or a site investigation pursuant to<br />

this Regulation are recorded by the<br />

competent person or the geotechnical<br />

specialist, as the case may be.<br />

An appraisal is intended to be a straightforward<br />

exercise to determine which excavations tips <strong>and</strong><br />

lagoons, proposed or existing, would pose a significant<br />

risk if they failed, or in the case of a tip or<br />

lagoon, move significantly more than that allowed<br />

in the design, <strong>and</strong> so merit an assessment by a<br />

geotechnical specialist. The relationship between<br />

the appraisal <strong>and</strong> assessment are illustrated in the<br />

flow chart in figure 43.<br />

Some appraisals will only identify those hazards<br />

from isolated minor failures, such as falls of a<br />

single rock or a small amount of s<strong>and</strong>. A geotechnical<br />

assessment does not focus on such hazards.<br />

While isolated falls of ground can be serious, they<br />

can generally be rectified immediately <strong>and</strong> be<br />

adequately controlled by routine daily inspection,<br />

use of appropriate equipment <strong>and</strong> working<br />

methods.<br />

The appraisal should be carried out with enough<br />

detail <strong>and</strong> sufficient expertise to decide, on the<br />

basis of the guidance in this Section, if an excavation,<br />

tip or lagoon poses a significant risk from<br />

collapse or movement. It is not normally necessary<br />

for appraisals to be carried out by a geotechnical<br />

specialist, though advice from one is appropriate<br />

where the level of hazard is unclear.<br />

When carrying out an appraisal there is no need<br />

to duplicate work already done, as long as all the<br />

matters detailed in this Section are adequately<br />

addressed. In some cases it is obvious that any<br />

failure of an excavation, tip or lagoon could prove<br />

fatal, for example, an excavation, or tip or lagoon<br />

near a public roadway, house or above quarry<br />

offices. In these cases the initial appraisal can be<br />

very brief as a geotechnical assessment by a<br />

geotechnical specialist will be needed.<br />

Areas where no one is at risk from a collapse of<br />

part of an excavation must be included in the<br />

appraisal because failure in such areas could affect<br />

the stability of the remainder of the excavations.<br />

Appraisal of such areas may also provide information<br />

relevant to the safety of other parts of the<br />

excavation.<br />

Among other things, the appraisal should take<br />

account of the material to be excavated or tipped,<br />

its structure, water content/drainage, the<br />

proximity of watercourses, roadways, workplaces,<br />

residential accommodation or ab<strong>and</strong>oned<br />

workings, <strong>and</strong> any evidence or history failures.The<br />

matters covered in inspections are also relevant.<br />

Significant hazard<br />

To determine if the hazard is significant or potentially<br />

significant it is necessary to consider how an<br />

excavation, tip or lagoon might feasibly fail <strong>and</strong><br />

the likely consequences of any such failure. The<br />

likely consequences are crucial when deciding if a<br />

particular hazard is significant. The probability of<br />

such a failure actually happening is not relevant<br />

in this context. The consequences depend on the<br />

likely scale of the failure <strong>and</strong> the area that could<br />

be affected by it, <strong>and</strong> whether people are likely to<br />

be injured.<br />

The hazard should be considered significant or<br />

potentially significant if such a failure would directly<br />

or indirectly, be:<br />

liable to endanger premises, roadways or other<br />

places where people are likely to be found offsite;<br />

or<br />

likely to cause serious or fatal injuries to<br />

persons on or off-site.<br />

If the degree of hazard is not clear <strong>and</strong> the excavation,<br />

tip or lagoon is not in the categories<br />

described in the “Excavations” or “Tips/Lagoons”<br />

Sections overleaf, the advice of a geotechnical<br />

specialist should be sought.<br />

Where a geotechnical specialist has been involved<br />

in design work or in geotechnical assessments he<br />

or she may provide written, practical guidance on<br />

what constitutes a significant hazard or potential<br />

significant hazard in the context of that particular<br />

site. Any such guidance should explain the basis on<br />

which it was produced.<br />

74<br />

SAFE QUARRY GUIDELINES TO THE SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE AT WORK (QUARRIES) REGULATIONS 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!