Safe Quarry - Health and Safety Authority
Safe Quarry - Health and Safety Authority
Safe Quarry - Health and Safety Authority
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PART 6 EXCAVATIONS INCLUDING (QUARRY FACES), TIPS AND LAGOONS<br />
(6) The operator shall ensure that -<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
any significant findings, <strong>and</strong><br />
any conclusions reached <strong>and</strong> the reasons<br />
for those conclusions made under an<br />
appraisal or a site investigation pursuant to<br />
this Regulation are recorded by the<br />
competent person or the geotechnical<br />
specialist, as the case may be.<br />
An appraisal is intended to be a straightforward<br />
exercise to determine which excavations tips <strong>and</strong><br />
lagoons, proposed or existing, would pose a significant<br />
risk if they failed, or in the case of a tip or<br />
lagoon, move significantly more than that allowed<br />
in the design, <strong>and</strong> so merit an assessment by a<br />
geotechnical specialist. The relationship between<br />
the appraisal <strong>and</strong> assessment are illustrated in the<br />
flow chart in figure 43.<br />
Some appraisals will only identify those hazards<br />
from isolated minor failures, such as falls of a<br />
single rock or a small amount of s<strong>and</strong>. A geotechnical<br />
assessment does not focus on such hazards.<br />
While isolated falls of ground can be serious, they<br />
can generally be rectified immediately <strong>and</strong> be<br />
adequately controlled by routine daily inspection,<br />
use of appropriate equipment <strong>and</strong> working<br />
methods.<br />
The appraisal should be carried out with enough<br />
detail <strong>and</strong> sufficient expertise to decide, on the<br />
basis of the guidance in this Section, if an excavation,<br />
tip or lagoon poses a significant risk from<br />
collapse or movement. It is not normally necessary<br />
for appraisals to be carried out by a geotechnical<br />
specialist, though advice from one is appropriate<br />
where the level of hazard is unclear.<br />
When carrying out an appraisal there is no need<br />
to duplicate work already done, as long as all the<br />
matters detailed in this Section are adequately<br />
addressed. In some cases it is obvious that any<br />
failure of an excavation, tip or lagoon could prove<br />
fatal, for example, an excavation, or tip or lagoon<br />
near a public roadway, house or above quarry<br />
offices. In these cases the initial appraisal can be<br />
very brief as a geotechnical assessment by a<br />
geotechnical specialist will be needed.<br />
Areas where no one is at risk from a collapse of<br />
part of an excavation must be included in the<br />
appraisal because failure in such areas could affect<br />
the stability of the remainder of the excavations.<br />
Appraisal of such areas may also provide information<br />
relevant to the safety of other parts of the<br />
excavation.<br />
Among other things, the appraisal should take<br />
account of the material to be excavated or tipped,<br />
its structure, water content/drainage, the<br />
proximity of watercourses, roadways, workplaces,<br />
residential accommodation or ab<strong>and</strong>oned<br />
workings, <strong>and</strong> any evidence or history failures.The<br />
matters covered in inspections are also relevant.<br />
Significant hazard<br />
To determine if the hazard is significant or potentially<br />
significant it is necessary to consider how an<br />
excavation, tip or lagoon might feasibly fail <strong>and</strong><br />
the likely consequences of any such failure. The<br />
likely consequences are crucial when deciding if a<br />
particular hazard is significant. The probability of<br />
such a failure actually happening is not relevant<br />
in this context. The consequences depend on the<br />
likely scale of the failure <strong>and</strong> the area that could<br />
be affected by it, <strong>and</strong> whether people are likely to<br />
be injured.<br />
The hazard should be considered significant or<br />
potentially significant if such a failure would directly<br />
or indirectly, be:<br />
liable to endanger premises, roadways or other<br />
places where people are likely to be found offsite;<br />
or<br />
likely to cause serious or fatal injuries to<br />
persons on or off-site.<br />
If the degree of hazard is not clear <strong>and</strong> the excavation,<br />
tip or lagoon is not in the categories<br />
described in the “Excavations” or “Tips/Lagoons”<br />
Sections overleaf, the advice of a geotechnical<br />
specialist should be sought.<br />
Where a geotechnical specialist has been involved<br />
in design work or in geotechnical assessments he<br />
or she may provide written, practical guidance on<br />
what constitutes a significant hazard or potential<br />
significant hazard in the context of that particular<br />
site. Any such guidance should explain the basis on<br />
which it was produced.<br />
74<br />
SAFE QUARRY GUIDELINES TO THE SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE AT WORK (QUARRIES) REGULATIONS 2008