CHAPTER X CHAPTER 4 - Cancer et environnement
CHAPTER X CHAPTER 4 - Cancer et environnement
CHAPTER X CHAPTER 4 - Cancer et environnement
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
Fig. 4.22 Seminoma. A Pseudoglandular variant of seminoma. B Cords of tumour cells in seminoma. C Cribriform variant of seminoma. D Alveolar variant of seminoma.<br />
D<br />
tion b<strong>et</strong>ween seminoma and embryonal<br />
carcinoma is difficult with respect to an<br />
area within a tumour or the entire neoplasm.<br />
Morphological discrimination features<br />
include: the discr<strong>et</strong>e uniform cells<br />
of seminoma which contrast with the<br />
pleomorphic overlapping cells of embryonal<br />
carcinoma; the lymphocytic and<br />
granulomatous response typical of seminoma<br />
but rare in embryonal carcinoma.<br />
PLAP and CD117 are distributed more<br />
diffusely in seminoma than embryonal<br />
Fig. 4.23 Positive staining for PLAP in typical seminoma.<br />
carcinoma, whereas CD30 and pancytokeratin<br />
are more pronounced in embryonal<br />
carcinoma. The florid lymphocytic or<br />
granulomatous response within seminoma<br />
occasionally prompts the misdiagnosis<br />
of an inflammatory lesion, especially<br />
on frozen section. Extensive sampling<br />
and a high power search for seminoma<br />
cells (supported by PLAP and CD117<br />
content) help reduce such errors.<br />
Conversely, other tumours are occasionally<br />
misinterpr<strong>et</strong>ed as classical seminoma,<br />
possibly as a consequence of their<br />
rarity, these include: spermatocytic seminoma,<br />
Leydig cell tumours, (especially<br />
those with clear/vacuolated cytoplasm);<br />
Sertoli cell tumours, in which tubule formation<br />
may resemble the tubular variant<br />
of seminoma: m<strong>et</strong>astases (e.g.<br />
melanoma). In all these neoplasms, the<br />
absence of IGCNU and the demonstration<br />
of either the typical seminoma<br />
immunophenotype or the immunocytochemical<br />
features of Leydig, Sertoli or<br />
the specific m<strong>et</strong>astatic tumour should<br />
limit error.<br />
Prognosis and predictive factors<br />
The size of the primary seminoma, necrosis,<br />
vascular space, and tunical invasion<br />
have all been related to clinical stage at<br />
presentation {1626,2616}. With respect<br />
to patients with stage I disease managed<br />
on high surveillance protocols, r<strong>et</strong>rospective<br />
studies have emphasized the<br />
size of the primary and invasion of the<br />
r<strong>et</strong>e testis as independent predictors of<br />
relapse {1202,2781}. The 4 year relapse<br />
free survivals were 94, 82 and 64% for<br />
tumours