17.01.2014 Views

CHAPTER X CHAPTER 4 - Cancer et environnement

CHAPTER X CHAPTER 4 - Cancer et environnement

CHAPTER X CHAPTER 4 - Cancer et environnement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Fig. 4.22 Seminoma. A Pseudoglandular variant of seminoma. B Cords of tumour cells in seminoma. C Cribriform variant of seminoma. D Alveolar variant of seminoma.<br />

D<br />

tion b<strong>et</strong>ween seminoma and embryonal<br />

carcinoma is difficult with respect to an<br />

area within a tumour or the entire neoplasm.<br />

Morphological discrimination features<br />

include: the discr<strong>et</strong>e uniform cells<br />

of seminoma which contrast with the<br />

pleomorphic overlapping cells of embryonal<br />

carcinoma; the lymphocytic and<br />

granulomatous response typical of seminoma<br />

but rare in embryonal carcinoma.<br />

PLAP and CD117 are distributed more<br />

diffusely in seminoma than embryonal<br />

Fig. 4.23 Positive staining for PLAP in typical seminoma.<br />

carcinoma, whereas CD30 and pancytokeratin<br />

are more pronounced in embryonal<br />

carcinoma. The florid lymphocytic or<br />

granulomatous response within seminoma<br />

occasionally prompts the misdiagnosis<br />

of an inflammatory lesion, especially<br />

on frozen section. Extensive sampling<br />

and a high power search for seminoma<br />

cells (supported by PLAP and CD117<br />

content) help reduce such errors.<br />

Conversely, other tumours are occasionally<br />

misinterpr<strong>et</strong>ed as classical seminoma,<br />

possibly as a consequence of their<br />

rarity, these include: spermatocytic seminoma,<br />

Leydig cell tumours, (especially<br />

those with clear/vacuolated cytoplasm);<br />

Sertoli cell tumours, in which tubule formation<br />

may resemble the tubular variant<br />

of seminoma: m<strong>et</strong>astases (e.g.<br />

melanoma). In all these neoplasms, the<br />

absence of IGCNU and the demonstration<br />

of either the typical seminoma<br />

immunophenotype or the immunocytochemical<br />

features of Leydig, Sertoli or<br />

the specific m<strong>et</strong>astatic tumour should<br />

limit error.<br />

Prognosis and predictive factors<br />

The size of the primary seminoma, necrosis,<br />

vascular space, and tunical invasion<br />

have all been related to clinical stage at<br />

presentation {1626,2616}. With respect<br />

to patients with stage I disease managed<br />

on high surveillance protocols, r<strong>et</strong>rospective<br />

studies have emphasized the<br />

size of the primary and invasion of the<br />

r<strong>et</strong>e testis as independent predictors of<br />

relapse {1202,2781}. The 4 year relapse<br />

free survivals were 94, 82 and 64% for<br />

tumours

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!