25.01.2014 Views

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

the total allowances allocated each year must not<br />

exceed the national cap. Every year, each individual<br />

source must hold enough allowances to cover its<br />

annual emissions. Unused allowances can be sold<br />

(traded) or banked (saved) for future use. The<br />

banking of allowances gives sources the fl exibility<br />

to determine how they will comply with program<br />

requirements over time.<br />

In 2009, the ARP’s SO 2<br />

program affected 3,572<br />

electric generating units (EGUs). The Environmental<br />

Protection Agency (EPA) allocated approximately<br />

9.5 million SO 2<br />

allowances under the ARP. Actual<br />

emissions from affected sources were 5.7 million<br />

tons of SO 2<br />

(see Figure 2), down from 7.6 million<br />

tons in 2008 and well below the <strong>2010</strong> cap of 8.95<br />

million tons. Part of this reduction was due to a lower<br />

demand for power in 2009 as well as new add-on<br />

pollution control technology to meet recent federal and<br />

state regulations, primarily in the eastern half of the<br />

country. Additionally in 2009, the number of banked<br />

allowances grew, from about 8.5 million available<br />

for 2008 compliance to approximately 12.3 million<br />

available for <strong>2010</strong> and future years.<br />

In addition to the electric power generation sector,<br />

emission reductions from other sources not affected<br />

by the ARP, including industrial and commercial<br />

boilers and the metals and refi ning industries, and<br />

the use of cleaner fuels in residential and commercial<br />

burners have contributed to an overall reduction in<br />

annual SO 2<br />

emissions. National SO 2<br />

emissions from<br />

all sources have fallen from nearly 26 million tons<br />

in 1980 to less than 11.4 million tons in 2008<br />

(see www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends).<br />

Figure 2. U.S. SO 2<br />

Emissions from Acid Rain Program<br />

Electric Generating Units, 1990–2009<br />

18<br />

16<br />

15.7<br />

14<br />

Mmillion Tons<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

11.2<br />

10.2<br />

7.6<br />

5.7<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1990 2000 2005 2008 2009<br />

Source: US EPA <strong>2010</strong><br />

Key Commitments and <strong>Progress</strong>: Nitrogen Oxides Emission Reductions<br />

Canada has met its commitment to<br />

reduce NO x<br />

emissions from power<br />

plants, major combustion sources<br />

and metal smelting operations by<br />

100,000 tonnes below the forecasted<br />

level of 970,000 tonnes. This commitment is based<br />

CANADA<br />

on a 1985 forecast of 2005 NO x<br />

emissions; in 2008,<br />

industrial emissions of NO x<br />

totaled 664,755 tonnes.<br />

Transportation sources contribute the majority of<br />

NO x<br />

emissions, accounting for nearly 53% of total<br />

Canadian emissions, with the remainder generated<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!