25.01.2014 Views

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The United States has various<br />

programs to ensure that air quality is<br />

not signifi cantly degraded by the<br />

addition of air pollutants from new or<br />

modifi ed major sources. The Clean Air<br />

Act requires major new stationary sources of air<br />

pollution and extensive modifi cations to major existing<br />

stationary sources to obtain preconstruction permits.<br />

The permitting process is called New Source Review<br />

(NSR) and applies both to areas that meet the<br />

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)<br />

(attainment areas) and areas that exceed the NAAQS<br />

(nonattainment areas). Permits for sources in attainment<br />

areas are prevention of significant deterioration (PSD)<br />

permits, while permits for sources located in<br />

nonattainment areas are nonattainment area<br />

(NAA) permits.<br />

UNITED STATES<br />

PSD permits require air pollution controls that<br />

represent the best available control technology<br />

(BACT). BACT is an emission limitation based on<br />

the maximum degree of reduction of each pollutant<br />

subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act. BACT<br />

is determined on a case-by-case basis and considers<br />

energy, environmental and economic impacts.<br />

NAA permits require the lowest achievable emission<br />

rate (LAER). BACT and LAER must be at least as strict<br />

as any existing New Source Performance Standard<br />

(NSPS) for sources. One important difference between<br />

NSR permits and the NSPS program is that NSR is<br />

applied on a source-specifi c basis, whereas the<br />

NSPS program applies to all sources nationwide.<br />

The PSD program also protects the air quality<br />

and visibility in Class I areas (i.e. national parks<br />

exceeding 6,000 acres and wilderness areas<br />

exceeding 5,000 acres). The federal land management<br />

agencies are responsible for protecting air qualityrelated<br />

values, such as visibility, in Class I areas by<br />

reviewing and commenting on construction permits.<br />

The Clean Air Act established the goal of improving<br />

visibility in the nation’s 156 Class I areas and returning<br />

these areas to natural visibility conditions (visibility<br />

that existed before human-caused air pollution);<br />

the 1999 Regional Haze Rule requires that states<br />

reach that goal by 2064. In July 2005, the EPA<br />

fi nalized amendments to the Regional Haze Rule.<br />

These amendments require the installation of emission<br />

controls, known as best available retrofi t technology<br />

(BART), on certain older, existing combustion sources<br />

within a group of 26 source categories, including<br />

certain EGUs that cause or contribute to visibility<br />

impairment in Class I areas. Many of these older<br />

sources have never been regulated, and applying<br />

BART will help improve visibility in Class I areas.<br />

Most of the regional haze SIPs have been submitted,<br />

and controls to satisfy the BART requirements are to<br />

be operational no later than fi ve years after the SIP<br />

is approved.<br />

The fi rst planning period establishes an assessment<br />

of expected visibility conditions in 2018. The SIPs are<br />

revised every 10 years, and states revise their visibility<br />

goals accordingly to ensure that reasonable progress<br />

is being made to achieve natural visibility conditions.<br />

There is also a reporting check every fi ve years, in<br />

which states report their interim progress toward<br />

reaching the goals. Additional information on the<br />

EPA’s Regional Haze Program can be found at<br />

.<br />

Figure 10 shows the annual average standard<br />

visual range within the United States for the period<br />

2004–2008. “Standard visual range” is defi ned as<br />

the farthest distance a large dark object can be seen<br />

during daylight hours. This distance is calculated<br />

using fi ne and coarse particle data from the IMPROVE<br />

network. Increased particle pollution reduces the<br />

visual range. The visual range under naturally<br />

occurring conditions without human-caused pollution<br />

in the United States is typically 45 to 90 miles (75 to<br />

150 km) in the east and 120 to 180 miles (200 to<br />

300 km) in the west. Additional information on the<br />

IMPROVE program and visibility in U.S. national<br />

parks can be found at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/<br />

improve/.<br />

Commitments<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!