25.01.2014 Views

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

such as premature mortality, hospital admissions or<br />

emergency department visits for cardiopulmonary<br />

diseases, increased respiratory symptoms, decreased<br />

lung function, and physiological changes or biomarkers<br />

for cardiac changes. Long-term exposure to fi ne<br />

particles has also been associated with mortality<br />

from cardiopulmonary diseases and lung cancer and<br />

effects on the respiratory system, such as decreased<br />

lung function and chronic respiratory disease.<br />

There are several sensitive or vulnerable subpopulations<br />

that appear to be at greater risk to PM-related effects.<br />

These include individuals with preexisting heart and<br />

lung disease, older adults and children.<br />

U.S. <strong>Report</strong> on Health Effects<br />

of NO 2<br />

The health effects of NO 2<br />

have been documented<br />

and critically assessed in the U.S. Environmental<br />

Protection Agency’s Integrated Science Assessment<br />

for Oxides of Nitrogen—Health Criteria (ISA). NO 2<br />

-<br />

associated exposures and health risks have been<br />

assessed in the Risk and Exposure Assessment to<br />

Support the Review of the NO 2<br />

Primary National<br />

Ambient Air Quality Standard (REA). 3 The purpose<br />

of the ISA was to critically evaluate and assess<br />

available scientifi c information to inform the review<br />

of the NO 2<br />

NAAQS, while the REA presents analyses<br />

of NO 2<br />

-associated exposures and health risks as<br />

well as an assessment of potential policy options for<br />

consideration with regard to the NO 2<br />

primary NAAQS.<br />

The ISA has concluded that the fi ndings of<br />

epidemiological, controlled human exposure, and<br />

animal toxicological studies provide evidence that is<br />

suffi cient to infer a likely causal relationship between<br />

respiratory effects and short-term (1–24 hours)<br />

NO 2<br />

exposure. The strongest evidence for such a<br />

relationship comes from epidemiological studies of<br />

respiratory effects including symptoms, emergency<br />

department visits and hospital admissions. A number<br />

of these studies, most of which were published after<br />

the previous review of the NO 2<br />

NAAQS (completed<br />

in 1996), have reported associations between shortterm<br />

ambient NO 2<br />

concentrations and respiratory<br />

morbidity in locations with NO 2<br />

concentrations below<br />

those allowed by the then-current NO 2<br />

NAAQS.<br />

Epidemiological studies are supported by evidence<br />

from experimental studies, including controlled<br />

human exposure studies that evaluate airway hyperresponsiveness<br />

in asthmatic individuals. Enhanced<br />

airway responsiveness could have important clinical<br />

implications for asthmatics since transient increases<br />

in airway responsiveness following NO 2<br />

exposure<br />

have the potential to increase symptoms and worsen<br />

asthma control. Overall, the ISA concluded that the<br />

epidemiological and experimental data sets form a<br />

plausible, consistent and coherent description of a<br />

relationship between NO 2<br />

exposures and an array of<br />

adverse health effects that range from the onset of<br />

respiratory symptoms to hospital admission.<br />

Scientific and Technical Cooperation and Research<br />

3<br />

The fi nal ISA and REA can be accessed at http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=194645 and<br />

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/nox/data/20081121_NO2_REA_fi nal.pdf, respectively.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!