2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission
2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission
2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
y 2007 the regions receiving greater than 15 kg/ha/yr<br />
of nitrate wet deposition had all but disappeared in<br />
the two countries, with the exception of small areas<br />
of Pennsylvania, New York and Ontario.<br />
Wet deposition measurements in Canada are<br />
made by the federal Canadian Air and Precipitation<br />
Monitoring Network (CAPMoN) and networks<br />
in a number of provinces/territories, including<br />
Alberta, the Northwest Territories, Quebec,<br />
New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Dry deposition<br />
estimates are made at a subset of CAPMoN sites<br />
using combined air concentration measurements<br />
and modeled dry deposition velocities—the socalled<br />
inferential technique. In the United States,<br />
wet deposition measurements are made by two<br />
coordinated networks: the National Atmospheric<br />
Deposition Program/National Trends Network<br />
(NADP/NTN), which is a collaboration of federal,<br />
state and nongovernmental organizations<br />
(http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/), and the NADP/<br />
Atmospheric Integrated Research Monitoring<br />
Network (AIRMoN), which is a sub-network of NADP<br />
funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric<br />
Administration (http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/AIRMoN/).<br />
Dry deposition estimates in the United States are<br />
made using the inferential technique based on<br />
modeled dry deposition velocities and ambient air<br />
concentration data collected by EPA, the National<br />
Park Service (NPS), and the Clean Air Status and<br />
Trends Network (CASTNET) (www.epa.gov/castnet).<br />
Wet deposition measurements in the United States<br />
and Canada are comparable, and the data are<br />
available from the websites of the individual<br />
networks and from a binational database accessible<br />
to the public at www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/natchem/<br />
index_e.html.<br />
However, contrary to wet deposition estimates, the<br />
comparability of dry deposition velocities calculated<br />
by the Canadian and U.S. models is poor, although<br />
comparability between the measured air concentration<br />
values is reasonable. Studies show that dry deposition<br />
can be an important contributor to total deposition;<br />
thus ongoing efforts are in place to study the sources<br />
of the differences between the modelled dry deposition<br />
values. At the Borden research station in Ontario,<br />
instruments have been co-located for a number of<br />
years as part of an ongoing bilateral inter-comparison<br />
study on modelling dry deposition. Recent studies<br />
attempt to quantify the sensitivity of both the CAPMoN<br />
and CASTNET dry deposition models to a variety<br />
of factors that infl uence the dry deposition velocity,<br />
with the goal of refi ning model parameters for better<br />
comparability in future measurements, and reconciling<br />
past measurements.<br />
Commitments<br />
Preventing Air Quality Deterioration and Protecting Visibility<br />
Canada is addressing the commitment<br />
to prevent air quality deterioration and<br />
ensure visibility protection by implementing<br />
the Canadian Environmental Assessment<br />
Act, the Canadian Environmental<br />
Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999), and the<br />
continuous improvement (CI) and keeping clean<br />
areas clean (KCAC) principles that are part of the<br />
Canada-wide Standards for Particulate Matter (PM)<br />
and Ozone.<br />
CANADA<br />
Federal and provincial environmental assessment<br />
regulation requires that air quality be considered<br />
for all major new point sources or modifi cations to<br />
existing sources to ensure that Canadian objectives to<br />
protect the environment and human health are met.<br />
Mandatory provincial reporting processes require new<br />
and existing sources to fi le notifi cations, which are<br />
reviewed to determine the scale of the environmental<br />
assessment appropriate to each case. CEPA 1999<br />
prefers to use pollution prevention in its approach<br />
to environmental protection. Implementing similar<br />
principles—pollution prevention, CI and KCAC—is<br />
also part of the Canada-wide Standards (CWS).<br />
There are numerous locations across Canada where<br />
ambient levels of PM and ozone are below the CWS.<br />
Actions are required to ensure that levels in these<br />
areas do not rise to the CWS, but rather, are reduced<br />
over time, and that clean areas are maintained. For<br />
example, although Metro Vancouver experiences good<br />
regional air quality relative to most other Canadian<br />
urban areas, the region adopted an Air Quality<br />
Management Plan (AQMP) in 2005 to maintain and<br />
11