25.01.2014 Views

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y 2007 the regions receiving greater than 15 kg/ha/yr<br />

of nitrate wet deposition had all but disappeared in<br />

the two countries, with the exception of small areas<br />

of Pennsylvania, New York and Ontario.<br />

Wet deposition measurements in Canada are<br />

made by the federal Canadian Air and Precipitation<br />

Monitoring Network (CAPMoN) and networks<br />

in a number of provinces/territories, including<br />

Alberta, the Northwest Territories, Quebec,<br />

New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Dry deposition<br />

estimates are made at a subset of CAPMoN sites<br />

using combined air concentration measurements<br />

and modeled dry deposition velocities—the socalled<br />

inferential technique. In the United States,<br />

wet deposition measurements are made by two<br />

coordinated networks: the National Atmospheric<br />

Deposition Program/National Trends Network<br />

(NADP/NTN), which is a collaboration of federal,<br />

state and nongovernmental organizations<br />

(http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/), and the NADP/<br />

Atmospheric Integrated Research Monitoring<br />

Network (AIRMoN), which is a sub-network of NADP<br />

funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric<br />

Administration (http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/AIRMoN/).<br />

Dry deposition estimates in the United States are<br />

made using the inferential technique based on<br />

modeled dry deposition velocities and ambient air<br />

concentration data collected by EPA, the National<br />

Park Service (NPS), and the Clean Air Status and<br />

Trends Network (CASTNET) (www.epa.gov/castnet).<br />

Wet deposition measurements in the United States<br />

and Canada are comparable, and the data are<br />

available from the websites of the individual<br />

networks and from a binational database accessible<br />

to the public at www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/natchem/<br />

index_e.html.<br />

However, contrary to wet deposition estimates, the<br />

comparability of dry deposition velocities calculated<br />

by the Canadian and U.S. models is poor, although<br />

comparability between the measured air concentration<br />

values is reasonable. Studies show that dry deposition<br />

can be an important contributor to total deposition;<br />

thus ongoing efforts are in place to study the sources<br />

of the differences between the modelled dry deposition<br />

values. At the Borden research station in Ontario,<br />

instruments have been co-located for a number of<br />

years as part of an ongoing bilateral inter-comparison<br />

study on modelling dry deposition. Recent studies<br />

attempt to quantify the sensitivity of both the CAPMoN<br />

and CASTNET dry deposition models to a variety<br />

of factors that infl uence the dry deposition velocity,<br />

with the goal of refi ning model parameters for better<br />

comparability in future measurements, and reconciling<br />

past measurements.<br />

Commitments<br />

Preventing Air Quality Deterioration and Protecting Visibility<br />

Canada is addressing the commitment<br />

to prevent air quality deterioration and<br />

ensure visibility protection by implementing<br />

the Canadian Environmental Assessment<br />

Act, the Canadian Environmental<br />

Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999), and the<br />

continuous improvement (CI) and keeping clean<br />

areas clean (KCAC) principles that are part of the<br />

Canada-wide Standards for Particulate Matter (PM)<br />

and Ozone.<br />

CANADA<br />

Federal and provincial environmental assessment<br />

regulation requires that air quality be considered<br />

for all major new point sources or modifi cations to<br />

existing sources to ensure that Canadian objectives to<br />

protect the environment and human health are met.<br />

Mandatory provincial reporting processes require new<br />

and existing sources to fi le notifi cations, which are<br />

reviewed to determine the scale of the environmental<br />

assessment appropriate to each case. CEPA 1999<br />

prefers to use pollution prevention in its approach<br />

to environmental protection. Implementing similar<br />

principles—pollution prevention, CI and KCAC—is<br />

also part of the Canada-wide Standards (CWS).<br />

There are numerous locations across Canada where<br />

ambient levels of PM and ozone are below the CWS.<br />

Actions are required to ensure that levels in these<br />

areas do not rise to the CWS, but rather, are reduced<br />

over time, and that clean areas are maintained. For<br />

example, although Metro Vancouver experiences good<br />

regional air quality relative to most other Canadian<br />

urban areas, the region adopted an Air Quality<br />

Management Plan (AQMP) in 2005 to maintain and<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!