25.01.2014 Views

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

2010 Progress Report - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Acid Deposition Monitoring, Modelling, Maps and Trends<br />

Airborne pollutants are deposited on the Earth’s<br />

surface by three processes: (1) wet deposition (rain<br />

and snow), (2) dry deposition (particles and gases),<br />

and (3) deposition by cloud water and fog. Wet<br />

deposition is comparatively easy to measure using<br />

precipitation monitors, and the concentration of<br />

sulphate and nitrate in precipitation is regularly used<br />

to assess the changing atmosphere as it responds<br />

Figure 4. 1990 Annual Wet<br />

Sulphate Deposition<br />

to decreasing or increasing sulphur and nitrogen<br />

emissions. In Canada, to facilitate this comparison,<br />

measurements of wet sulphate deposition are typically<br />

corrected to omit the contribution of sea salt sulphate<br />

at near-ocean sites (less than 62 miles, or 100 kilometres<br />

[km], from the coast).<br />

Figures 4 through 6 show the U.S.–Canada spatial<br />

patterns of wet sulphate (sea salt-corrected)<br />

deposition for 1990, 2000 and 2007 (the most recent<br />

data year). Figures 7 through 9 show the patterns<br />

of wet nitrate deposition for the same three years.<br />

Deposition contours are not shown in western Canada<br />

because Canadian scientists judged that the locations<br />

of the contour lines were unacceptably uncertain<br />

due to the paucity of measurement sites in all of the<br />

western provinces. To compensate for the lack of<br />

contours, wet deposition values in western Canada<br />

are shown as coloured circles at the locations of the<br />

federal/provincial/territorial measurement sites.<br />

Commitments<br />

Source: National Atmospheric Chemistry (NAtChem) Database<br />

(www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/natchem/index_e.html) and the National<br />

Atmospheric Deposition Program<br />

Figure 5. 2000 Annual Wet<br />

Sulphate Deposition<br />

The three maps indicate that wet sulphate deposition<br />

is consistently highest in eastern North America<br />

around the lower Great Lakes, with a gradient following<br />

a southwest-to-northeast axis running from the<br />

confl uence of the Mississippi and Ohio rivers through<br />

the lower Great Lakes. The patterns for 1990, 2000<br />

and 2007 illustrate that signifi cant reductions occurred<br />

Figure 6. 2007 Annual Wet<br />

Sulphate Deposition<br />

Source: National Atmospheric Chemistry (NAtChem) Database<br />

(www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/natchem/index_e.html) and the National<br />

Atmospheric Deposition Program<br />

Source: National Atmospheric Chemistry (NAtChem) Database<br />

(www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/natchem/index_e.html) and the National<br />

Atmospheric Deposition Program<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!