Background Material for December 7 Conference Call - Alliance for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Very practical and I didn’t mind at all that you did try to make it a “workshop”. I thought the comparison table the last (?) speaker made was very helpful. The first speaker didn’t need ot go into quite so much detail as the 3 sites seemed pretty similar. In general you coul dhave moved through the sites a bit faster. There was too much droning on about the individual sites, the resource is phenomenal but not how it was presented Thank you for your task force that has helped provide great resources and scored them with criteria to help those of us that don’t have time to look for find all the sites. I don’t think this session needed 90 minutes Fantastic high yield workshop Speakers needed mikes--it was so hard to hear from the back with computers clicking and texting phones around me. Next time show the web site in large print on the top of the slide to read from the back of the room so I can linkt he notes I took with the correct site. I am so interested in what the reviewers think of the sites and want to digest them all. Most useful resource gained from the meeting Very useful exposure to the sites would like to see this expanded to more subjects great job taking on the searches Session leaders did an amazing amount of good work to assess these site. job well done! Fun hearing from 5 different speakers. Very relevant to what we all do. Really appreciate all the work of this task force! There is no need to review each individual site - can quickly read a summary and check out the site ourselves. The process is more helpful to discuss as well as some potential uses for the future Great resources. Nicely vetted. Nice session overall. Appreciate the hard work done by the task force Would be nice to have a one-page Consumer Reports type of summary of the sites. 107. Hospitalist Medicine: Growth, Retention, and Transistion to an Academic Program Tammy Lederer Sajeev Handa, MD Peter J. Ceriani Bethany Gentilesco, MD Presentation Content 5.16 from 19 responses 5.05 from 19 responses Workshop Session and Individual Speaker Comments: This was possibly a helpful session, but not for me, i left early. i thought it would be more of how to make a hospitalist program more academic, but felt it was more number/salary based and meant for administrators. would make that more clear on the description of the course. The topic was very interesting, and the speakers made some excellent points. It would have benefited from the perspective of an additional, more mature academic program. Terrific and varied presentation showing the teaching and non teaching models at a single Dept of Medicine I thought the presentation of non teaching coupled with a teaching program was very worthwhile. Didn’t think there was anything very novel here. This was a lecture and there was not workshop activity. This was more appropriate for a SHM audience rather than educators. Unfortunately, one of the speakers seemed to have been taken so advantage of by her hospital employer that the session disintegrated into disbelief on the part of the attendees. This really distracted the audience and took away from the educational value of the session. Very good session with excellent ideas/suggestions but got too bogged down in specific detail at the end. One institution’s experience still untested. Not yet ready for prime time. This workshop was highly variable. The presentations from the hospitalist and financial officer were very good. The presentation from the human resources person was not necessary. The presentation by the hospitalist from the Mariam Hospital was the worst I have ever heard at a APDIM meeting. She was a vey Academic Internal Medicine Week 2009 Evaluation Summary Page 8
poor speaker, presented a structure where she was running two inpatient services and was the attending on 40 patients at the same time. Members of the audience kept questioning her since it didn’t seem conceivable that this was what was going on but she confirmed the figures. She also had no idea on the finances or source of funding for the program. What she presented raises serious patient safety and educational issues. Don’t let her speak at APDIM again! 108. Improving Professionalism by Assessing Clinical-Ethical Ability among Residents with Observed Structural Clinical Excercises (OSCEs) Vijay Rajput, MD Emily Hartsough Elizabeth Cerceo, MD Presentation Content 6.71 from seven responses 6.88 from eight responses 109. Mental Health Challenges in Learners: Identification and Remediation Melissa A. McNeil, MD Raquel Buranosky, MD Janine M. Frank, MD Frank J. Kroboth, MD Presentation Content 6.33 from 12 responses 6.42 from 12 responses Workshop Session and Individual Speaker Comments: Excellent workshop Great speakers and extremely useful information - very well done!! Excellent, would love more written info and/or references 110. Qualitative Analysis for Medical Educators Katherine Chretien, MD Shirphra Ginsburg, MD Karen E. Hauer, MD Presentation Content 6.47 from 19 responses 6.47 from 19 responses Workshop Session and Individual Speaker Comments: Nice job explaining basics of a difficult research area Very enthusiastic presenters, i was impressed with how much work this is. Seems like one needs funds for interviewers and transcribers, before one even gets started. Overall good, but 90 minutes was clearly not enough time to get familiar with the material. Good breakout sessions. I would have appreciated a user’s guide rather than an investigator’s introduction, which this seemed to be. Excellent presentation. wish there was more time. Would suggest presenters consider doing an even more basic session- including defining some of the terms used. Would like more time to practice coding. Academic Internal Medicine Week 2009 Evaluation Summary Page 9
Page 1 and 2: Memorandum To: AIM Program Planning
Page 3 and 4: AIM Program Planning Committee (Jul
Page 5 and 6: Timeline for Planning the 31st Annu
Page 7 and 8: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 30th An
Page 9 and 10: Room 409, Level Four Financial and
Page 11 and 12: 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. AAIM Lunch
Page 13 and 14: Room 405, Level Four Room 301, Leve
Page 15 and 16: Room 415, Level Four 114. Writing a
Page 17 and 18: Thursday, October 22, 2009 AAIM Boa
Page 19 and 20: Saturday, October 24, 2009 6:30 a.m
Page 21 and 22: AIM Precourse for New Administrator
Page 23 and 24: Academic Internal Medicine Week 200
Page 25 and 26: Speaker from Penn was a little infl
Page 27 and 28: Speakers were good but it was a dra
Page 29: An interesting discussion. Wish tha
Page 33 and 34: Lot of material covered. I thought
Page 35 and 36: Speakers really knew their topics -
Page 37 and 38: networking. I could see how roundta
Page 39 and 40: AIM Workshop Session II Average Pre
Page 41 and 42: 301. Challenges in Implementing a W
Page 43 and 44: If we have joint meetings with APDI
Page 45 and 46: get a head count for last day lunch
Page 47 and 48: not a workshop), I only got to atte
Page 49 and 50: Use of Portfolios for monitoring mi
Page 51: AIM Program Planning Committee Meet

Background Material for December 7 Conference Call - Alliance for ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?