Background Material for December 7 Conference Call - Alliance for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

30th Annual AIM Educational Conference Welcome and Introductions Catherine G. Wood Presentation Content 5.94 from 110 responses 5.94 from 107 responses Session and Individual Speaker Comments: Short and to the point was appreciated Good but this session should really start at 9am. What AIM forgets is that you do have alot of people from the west coast coming in who are trying to deal with a 3 hour time difference. Starting the sessions at 8am is just too early. Precise to the key points Plenary Session I, “Organization of Departments of Internal Medicine: Centers, Institutes, and Multidisciplinary Frameworks” Lindsay J. Graham, Moderator Paul E. Klotman, MD William B. Applegate, MD Max Wicha, MD Presentation Content 5.75 from 91 responses 5.92 from 88 responses Session and Individual Speaker Comments: Should have allowed more time for questions! It was very helpful to hear the perspectives from each of the three parties (Dean, DOM Chair, Ca Ctr Dir.) Thanks for bringing them together for this. This was one my least favorite session. I think the panel was made up of good people but there was not enough Q&A and interaction with the audience. I did not like the format. It felt like we were being talked at for two hours and after a while you lost interest in the conversation. I’m involved in helping getting a center started, and after the presentation, I learned I wasn’t! I am now involted in getting a program started. It saved me a lot of effort. Klotman was particularly helpful. I would of recommended that this not be the start off session it was good but it was a hard topic to jump off with. Lindsay talked too long and didn’t leave enough time for speakers. More time for questions and answers. Good material, good information, just no time for questions. went too long. Found this topic very interesting and relevant Too long, application to administrators unclear. It was important information and the format (Q&A to panel instead of slides) was refreshing and interesting. The time management was really poor, however, and there was not enough time for questions from the floor, which would have made the presentation more interesting. This was excellent, it was good to hear the spectrum More formal info would have been better. Good breakdown of complicated information. Each speaker was very knowledgeable. It’s interesting to hear from chairs, when so much of what we do administering is trying to interpret what chairs’ and other high ranking faculty’s goals are. The speakers were knowledgeable, engaging and I appreciate how they were able to connect their topics to the administrators’ concerns, i.e. where do we appoint faculty, etc. Wish there would have been more time for questions. probably not a good session to start with, not very dynamic or energetic topic to kick off the meeting. Academic Internal Medicine Week 2009 Evaluation Summary Page 12
Speakers really knew their topics - especially Chair at Mt Sinai and was very engaging. Have him come again next year The panel was extremely knowledgeable and I appreciated the caliber of the representatives. Excellent course content AIM Workshop Session I Average Presentation=6.05 Average Content=6.10 101. Guideline Metrics for Determining Appropriate Administrative Staffing Levels (in Clinical, Research, and Educational Domains) Joseph Gough Steve Vinciguerra Luis Rivera Presentation Content 6.00 from 17 responses 6.19 from 16 responses Workshop Session and Individual Speaker Comments: Great session, suggest having a committee to expand this analysis. Good information which we all could use. Topic was relevant and intersting. would be better if had more comparison institutions and some standard staffing comparison Excellent presentation by all members of the panel. Very good material, lots of interest in this topic. I liked having two different schools represented. Look forward to more information as it becomes available. Hopefully a survey will be developed. By far the best presentation of the conference. An hour and a half was not sufficient for the content. I think they each could have done a presentation in the allotted time (1.5 hrs each) to allow more time for Q&A and to dig a little deeper. SO MUCH content and meat for the time allowed. 102. Empowering Data to Tell a Story—Two Approaches to Business Intelligence Tools and Dashboards Margaret L. Ealy Michael A. Zang Elizabeth A. Wildman Presentation Content 6.00 from 22 responses 6.09 from 22 responses Workshop Session and Individual Speaker Comments: Two very different approaches and both very helpful. Two very different presentations probably would of not combined them. The session started a bit early and was overflowing - thus, a bit distracting. Overall, I enjoyed the presentation from Bess. Wildman was EXCELLENT. The U of V content and speakers was interesting and informative. The content from UPitt was less interesting and took up too much time during the session. Great session. information was timely & intuitive to needs. Both presentations were well organized & kept interest of all in the room. I appreciated Ms. Ealy’s clear and careful explanation of the UPMC dashboard. It was useful to see what is of importance to other institutions, and understand how the choose to monitor and represent those measures of interest. Less useful was hearing UVA’s tale of trials and tribulations launching their data mining system. Yes, I could relate their concerns to ones at our university, and was impressed by their efforts, Academic Internal Medicine Week 2009 Evaluation Summary Page 13
Page 1 and 2: Memorandum To: AIM Program Planning
Page 3 and 4: AIM Program Planning Committee (Jul
Page 5 and 6: Timeline for Planning the 31st Annu
Page 7 and 8: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 30th An
Page 9 and 10: Room 409, Level Four Financial and
Page 11 and 12: 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. AAIM Lunch
Page 13 and 14: Room 405, Level Four Room 301, Leve
Page 15 and 16: Room 415, Level Four 114. Writing a
Page 17 and 18: Thursday, October 22, 2009 AAIM Boa
Page 19 and 20: Saturday, October 24, 2009 6:30 a.m
Page 21 and 22: AIM Precourse for New Administrator
Page 23 and 24: Academic Internal Medicine Week 200
Page 25 and 26: Speaker from Penn was a little infl
Page 27 and 28: Speakers were good but it was a dra
Page 29 and 30: An interesting discussion. Wish tha
Page 31 and 32: poor speaker, presented a structure
Page 33: Lot of material covered. I thought
Page 37 and 38: networking. I could see how roundta
Page 39 and 40: AIM Workshop Session II Average Pre
Page 41 and 42: 301. Challenges in Implementing a W
Page 43 and 44: If we have joint meetings with APDI
Page 45 and 46: get a head count for last day lunch
Page 47 and 48: not a workshop), I only got to atte
Page 49 and 50: Use of Portfolios for monitoring mi
Page 51: AIM Program Planning Committee Meet

Background Material for December 7 Conference Call - Alliance for ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?